Interactive Cone Contraction for Evolutionary Mutliple Objective Optimization

We present a new interactive evolutionary algorithm for Multiple Objective Optimization (MOO) which combines the NSGA-II method with a cone contraction method. It requires the Decision Maker (DM) to provide preference information in form of a reference point and pairwise comparisons of solutions from a current population. This information is represented with a compatible Achievement Scalarizing Function (ASF) which is used to guide the evolutionary search towards the most preferred region of the Pareto front. The performance of the proposed algorithm is illustrated on a set of benchmark problems. The experimental results confirm its ability to converge quickly to the DM’s most preferred region. Its competitive advantage over the state-of-the-art method, called NEMO-0, is increasing when the DM provides a richer preference information composed of a greater number of pairwise comparisons of solutions.

[1]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization , 1993, ICGA.

[2]  Michał K. Tomczyk,et al.  Interactive Evolutionary Multiple Objective Optimization for Group Decision Incorporating Value-based Preference Disaggregation Methods , 2017 .

[3]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[4]  Milosz Kadzinski,et al.  Interactive Robust Cone Contraction Method for Multiple Objective Optimization Problems , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[5]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Learning Value Functions in Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Krzysztof Ciomek,et al.  Heuristics for prioritizing pair-wise elicitation questions with additive multi-attribute value models , 2017 .

[7]  A. Wierzbicki On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems , 1986 .

[8]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Consideration of Partial User Preferences in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2008, Multiobjective Optimization.

[9]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiobjective optimization , 1997 .

[10]  Tommi Tervonen,et al.  Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Murat Köksalan,et al.  An Interactive Evolutionary Metaheuristic for Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Lakhmi C. Jain,et al.  Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2005, Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization.

[13]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Method Based on Progressively Approximated Value Functions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[14]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Evaluation of multi-objective optimization approaches for solving green supply chain design problems , 2017 .

[15]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Roberto Battiti,et al.  Brain-Computer Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Genetic Algorithm Adapting to the Decision Maker , 2010, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..