Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Pelli,et al. Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.
[2] Katharine Tillman,et al. Crowding, shuffling, and capitalizing reveal three processes in reading , 2005 .
[3] D. Pelli,et al. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.
[4] E. M. Fine. The relative benefit of word context is a constant proportion of letter identification time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[5] P. Bennett,et al. Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.
[6] Denis G. Pelli,et al. The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.
[7] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Object substitution without reentry , 2002 .
[8] Michael J Wenger,et al. A decisional component of holistic encoding. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[9] R. Malach,et al. The topography of high-order human object areas , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[10] S. Rakover. Featural vs. configurational information in faces: a conceptual and empirical analysis. , 2002, British journal of psychology.
[11] H Strasburger,et al. Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] P. Cavanagh,et al. The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Human Body , 2001 .
[14] J. Lund,et al. Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] K. Nakayama,et al. Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[16] Talma Hendler,et al. Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[17] N. Kanwisher,et al. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.
[18] Jyrki Rovamo,et al. Identification of facial images in peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.
[19] D. Pelli,et al. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking : Distinguishing feature detection and integration , 2001 .
[20] D. Hay,et al. Developmental changes in the recognition of faces and facial features. , 2000 .
[21] V. Bruce,et al. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .
[22] Robert F Hess,et al. The foveal ‘crowding’ effect: physics or physiology? , 2000, Vision Research.
[23] I. Gauthier,et al. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[24] M. Tarr,et al. Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[25] M. Tarr,et al. Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[26] D G Pelli,et al. Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[27] N. Kanwisher,et al. Brain Imaging , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.
[28] M. D’Esposito,et al. An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.
[29] Philippe G Schyns,et al. Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.
[30] Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.
[31] M. Farah,et al. What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.
[32] Michael B. Lewis,et al. Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Understanding Caricatures of Faces , 2022 .
[33] T A Polk,et al. The neural development and organization of letter recognition: evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[34] James W. Tanaka,et al. Expertise in object and face recognition , 1997 .
[35] J. Tanaka,et al. Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[36] M. Tarr,et al. Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.
[37] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[38] H. Babkoff,et al. Lexical decision, visual hemifield and angle of orientation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.
[39] G. Rhodes,et al. Facial Distinctiveness and the Power of Caricatures , 1997, Perception.
[40] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[41] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[42] D Whitaker,et al. Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision. , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.
[43] M. Farah,et al. The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.
[44] William Prinzmetal,et al. Visual Feature Integration in a World of Objects , 1995 .
[45] Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al. Image-based object recognition , 1995 .
[46] M. Farah,et al. What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[47] P. King-Smith,et al. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.
[48] Nk Logothetis,et al. Image-based Object Recognition. , 1994 .
[49] Timothy R. Jordan,et al. Word Superiority Over Isolated Letters: The Neglected Role of Flanking Mask Contours , 1993 .
[50] M. Farah,et al. Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[51] David J. Field,et al. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.
[52] D. Levi,et al. The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.
[53] P. Ekman. Are there basic emotions? , 1992, Psychological review.
[54] Denis G. Pelli,et al. Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.
[55] I. Rentschler,et al. Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[56] Mark H. Johnson,et al. Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.
[57] Martha J. Farah,et al. Cognitive Neuropsychology: Patterns of Co-occurrence Among the Associative Agnosias: Implications for Visual Object Representation , 1991 .
[58] M. Farah. Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .
[59] S. Ullman. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.
[60] T. Valentine. Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.
[61] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[62] S. Carey,et al. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[63] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[64] S. Klein,et al. Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.
[65] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.
[66] J. Fodor,et al. The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .
[67] B. Tversky,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .
[68] A. Watson,et al. Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.
[69] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[70] R W Schvaneveldt,et al. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.
[71] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.
[72] Jacob Nachmias,et al. On the psychometric function for contrast detection , 1981, Vision Research.
[73] J. Robson,et al. Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.
[74] James L. McClelland,et al. Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification , 1980 .
[75] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[76] S. Carey,et al. Developmental changes in the representation of faces. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[77] Wayne D. Gray,et al. Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.
[78] C. C. Goren,et al. Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.
[79] N Weisstein,et al. Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.
[80] H. Bouma. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.
[81] H. BOUMA,et al. Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.
[82] D. D. Wheeler. Processes in word recognition , 1970 .
[83] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[84] R. Yin. Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .
[85] F. Smith,et al. Familiarity of configuration vs discriminability of features in the visual identification of words , 1969 .
[86] J. Robson,et al. Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.
[87] E. Smith. Effects of familiarity on stimulus recognition and categorization. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.
[88] W. D. Ellis. A Source Book Of Gestalt Psychology , 1939 .
[89] M. Wertheimer. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .