Where AD plants wildly grow: The spatio-temporal diffusion of agricultural biogas production in the Czech Republic

There is fundamental agreement about the environmental benefits of renewable energy technologies, but unintended consequences arising from their deployment are frequent sources of conflicts. The Czech Republic has committed itself to supply 13.5% of its electricity consumption from renewable sources by 2020. High state incentives for renewable energies have been provided to achieve this target, however critical questions can be asked about the appropriateness of the design of the supporting frameworks which caused a boom in photo-voltaic (PV) installations on agricultural land, as well as a boom in the installation of agricultural anaerobic digestion (AD) plants fuelled by dedicated energy crops. This paper analyses the diffusion of agricultural AD plants in the Czech Republic, focusing especially on locational characteristics in relation to the quality of agricultural land, agricultural and population census data. Statistical analysis of those spatial datasets show that agricultural AD plants are mostly located in less favourable agricultural areas, in regions having recently experienced a reduction in cattle breeding, and in regions with significant increases of sowing areas of green maize. These findings suggests shortcomings in the supporting policy for AD plants in the Czech Republic, resulting in unintended environmental consequences, and missed opportunities to enhance energy self-sufficiency and resilience in the countryside.

[1]  Peter Weiland,et al.  Production and energetic use of biogas from energy crops and wastes in Germany , 2003, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[2]  Nan Hua,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Structural Equation Modeling and Multiple Regression Research Methodologies: E-commerce Context , 2010 .

[3]  Andrew Barnett,et al.  The diffusion of energy technology in the rural areas of developing countries: A synthesis of recent experience , 1990 .

[4]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[5]  S. Ward,et al.  Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany , 2010 .

[6]  O. Kuik,et al.  Local acceptance of renewable energy - A case study from southeast Germany , 2011 .

[7]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[8]  Leon Cizelj,et al.  A novel concept for a renewable network within municipal energy systems , 2013 .

[9]  N. Meyer.  European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalised markets , 2003 .

[10]  Georgios A. Florides,et al.  A review of simple to scientific models for anaerobic digestion , 2014 .

[11]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries , 2011 .

[12]  Daniel A. Griffith,et al.  Spatial Statistics and Geostatistics: Theory and Applications for Geographic Information Science and Technology , 2013 .

[13]  Z. Kučera,et al.  A Typology of Rural Space in Czechia according to its Potential for Development , 2010 .

[14]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging? , 2012 .

[15]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  Bohumil Frantál,et al.  New Trends and Challenges for Energy Geographies: Introduction to The Special Issue , 2014 .

[17]  Paul Upham,et al.  Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: Reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case study , 2009 .

[18]  Emmanuel K. Yiridoe,et al.  Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production , 2009 .

[19]  Stanislav Martinát,et al.  The importance of vulnerable areas with potential tourismdevelopment: a case study of the Bohemian forest and SouthBohemia tourism regions , 2014 .

[20]  R. Revelle.  Energy sources for rural development , 1979 .

[21]  Georgios A. Florides,et al.  Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: current status and potential in Cyprus. , 2014 .

[22]  Qiu Daxiong,et al.  Diffusion and innovation in the Chinese biogas program , 1990 .

[23]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[24]  Danyel Reiche,et al.  Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states , 2004 .

[25]  M. Ringel.  Fostering the use of renewable energies in the European Union: the race between feed-in tariffs and green certificates , 2006 .

[26]  Bohumil Frantál.  Have Local Government and Public Expectations of Wind Energy Project Benefits Been Met? Implications for Repowering Schemes , 2015 .

[27]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Introduction to Geography , 1988 .

[28]  D. van der Horst.  Landscapes of Lost Energy: Counterfactual Geographical Imaginary for A More Sustainable Society , 2014 .

[29]  T. Johansson,et al.  European renewable energy policy at crossroads--Focus on electricity support mechanisms , 2008 .

[30]  H. Svobodová.  Changes on Foreign Trade in Agricultural Commodities in the Czech Republic , 2014 .

[31]  M. Kral,et al.  AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN THE 21ST CENTURY: FROM PRODUCTIVISM TO POST-PRODUCTIVISM , 2013 .

[32]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  EU renewable energy support policy: Faith or facts? , 2009 .

[33]  O. Konecný,et al.  Agriculture of the Czech Republic after Accession to the EU: Regional Differentiation , 2011 .

[34]  Charles R. Warren.  Scales of Disconnection: Mismatches Shaping the Geographies of Emerging Energy Landscapes , 2014 .

[35]  Josef Kunc,et al.  From Wasted Land to Megawatts: How to Convert Brownfields Into Solar Power Plants (the Case of the Czech Republic) , 2014 .

[36]  Judith Lipp,et al.  Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[37]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  Ten years of renewable electricity policies in Spain: An analysis of successive feed-in tariff reforms , 2008 .

[38]  Michael Søgaard Jørgensen,et al.  The controversies over bioenergy in Denmark: 'bio' is not the same as 'sustainable'. , 2012 .

[39]  P. Pinstrup-Andersen,et al.  Food security: definition and measurement , 2009, Food Security.

[40]  J. Reid.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2003 .

[41]  Li Jian,et al.  Socioeconomic Barriers to Biogas Development in Rural Southwest China: An Ethnographic Case Study , 2009 .

[42]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process , 1967 .

[43]  Antonín Věžník,et al.  IMPACTS OF THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE VYSOČINA REGION (CZECH REPUBLIC) BY THE VIEW OF THE FARMERS , 2011 .

[44]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[45]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[46]  Shane Ward,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .

[47]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Spatial diffusion of biogas technology in Switzerland: a GIS-based multi-agent simulation approach. , 2009 .

[49]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[50]  I. Dincer.  Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review , 2000 .

[51]  Giovanni Zurlini,et al.  Spatially explicit assessment of local biomass availability for distributed biogas production via anaerobic co-digestion – Mediterranean case study , 2012 .

[52]  Sérgio Fernando Mayerle,et al.  A systemic approach for dimensioning and designing anaerobic bio-digestion/energy generation biomass supply networks. , 2014 .

[53]  O. Konecný,et al.  Geographical Perspectives on Agritourism in The Czech Republic , 2014 .

[54]  G. Robinson.  Methods and Techniques in Human Geography , 1998 .

[55]  Karsten Neuhoff,et al.  Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development , 2008 .

[56]  Bohumil Frantál,et al.  Wind turbines in tourism landscapes: Czech Experience , 2011 .

[57]  Hasan Selim,et al.  A network design model for biomass to energy supply chains with anaerobic digestion systems , 2014 .

[58]  O. Bastian,et al.  Perceptions of Energy Crop Production by Lay People and Farmers Using the Ecosystem Services Approach , 2014 .

[59]  Josef Kunc,et al.  Spatial consequences of biogas production and agricultural changes in the Czech Republic after EU accession: Mutual symbiosis, coexistence or parasitism? , 2013 .

[60]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  An agent-based spatial simulation to evaluate the promotion of electricity from agricultural biogas plants in Germany , 2013 .

[61]  Y. Gagnon,et al.  An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment , 2010 .

[62]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  UK biomass energy since 1990: the mismatch between project types and policy objectives , 2005 .

[63]  P. Haggett.  Geography: A Global Synthesis , 2001 .

[64]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Adoption of payments for ecosystem services: An application of the Hagerstrand model , 2011 .