Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise
暂无分享,去创建一个
Frédéric Berthommier | Christian Füllgrabe | Christian Lorenzi | F. Berthommier | C. Lorenzi | C. Füllgrabe | Christian Füllgrabe
[1] The role of envelope beat cues in the detection and discrimination of second-order amplitude modulation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] W. Shofner,et al. Responses of ventral cochlear nucleus units in the chinchilla to amplitude modulation by low-frequency, two-tone complexes. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Brian C J Moore,et al. Testing the concept of a modulation filter bank: the audibility of component modulation and detection of phase change in three-component modulators. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Stuart Rosen,et al. THE PERCEPTION OF SPEECH IN FLUCTUATING NOISE , 1993 .
[6] B. Moore,et al. Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[8] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[9] W A Yost,et al. Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] J H Grose,et al. Comodulation masking release for multicomponent signals. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[12] Benjamin Munson,et al. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] G. L. Powers,et al. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise , 1973 .
[15] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] J M Festen. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] D. Grantham,et al. Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] T. Houtgast,et al. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .
[21] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[22] A. Duquesnoy. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] R. M. Warren. Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.
[24] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Effects of envelope expansion on speech recognition , 1999, Hearing Research.
[25] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[26] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[27] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] T. Houtgast. Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[30] T. Dau,et al. Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] S. Rosen,et al. Individual variability in the perception of cues to place contrasts in initial stops , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[32] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Louis-Jean Boë,et al. La parole et son traitement automatique , 1989 .
[34] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] W A Yost,et al. Modulation detection interference with two-component masker modulators. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] T. Dau,et al. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] B. Kollmeier,et al. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] S. Rosen,et al. Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] A Rees,et al. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrow-band noise carriers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] A. Bregman. Auditory Scene Analysis , 2008 .
[42] C. Lorenzi,et al. Second-order temporal modulation transfer functions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] Charles Speaks,et al. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[46] Michelle R. Molis,et al. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[47] B C Moore,et al. Modulation masking produced by beating modulators. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] B. Moore,et al. Estimation of the level and phase of the simple distortion tone the modulation domain. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.