Nurse Informaticians Report Low Satisfaction and Multi-level Concerns with Electronic Health Records: Results from an International Survey

This study presents a qualitative content analysis of nurses' satisfaction and issues with current electronic health record (EHR) systems, as reflected in one of the largest international surveys of nursing informatics. Study participants from 45 countries (n=469) ranked their satisfaction with the current state of nursing functionality in EHRs as relatively low. Two-thirds of the participants (n=283) provided disconcerting comments when explaining their low satisfaction rankings. More than one half of the comments identified issues at the system level (e.g., poor system usability; non-integrated systems and poor interoperability; lack of standards; and limited functionality/missing components), followed by user-task issues (e.g., failure of systems to meet nursing clinical needs; non nursing-specific systems) and environment issues (e.g., low prevalence of EHRs; lack of user training). The study results call for the attention of international stakeholders (educators, managers, policy makers) to improve the current issues with EHRs from a nursing perspective.

[1]  Matthew W. Tanzer,et al.  Successful electronic implementation of discharge referral decision support has a positive impact on 30- and 60-day readmissions. , 2015, Research in nursing & health.

[2]  Pascal Staccini,et al.  Which functionalities are available in the electronic health record systems used by French general practitioners? An assessment study of 15 systems , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  LeMai Nguyen,et al.  Electronic health records implementation: An evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  C. Keijsers,et al.  Educational interventions to improve the meaningful use of Electronic Health Records: A review of the literature: BEME Guide No. 29 , 2013, Medical teacher.

[6]  Tinja Lääveri,et al.  National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: Physicians suffer from poor usability , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Clement J. McDonald,et al.  What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  Virginia K. Saba,et al.  Essentials of Nursing Informatics , 2005 .

[9]  Lisiane Pruinelli,et al.  Current Trends in Nursing Informatics: Results of an International Survey , 2016, Nursing Informatics.

[10]  N. Staggers,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Designs of Clinical Technology: Findings and Recommendations for Future Research , 2009, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[11]  G. Keenan.  Big Data in Health Care: An Urgent Mandate to CHANGE Nursing EHRs! , 2014, On-line journal of nursing informatics.

[12]  Pirkko Nykänen,et al.  Usability of Electronic Nursing Record Systems: Definition and Results from an Evaluation Study in Finland , 2011, ITCH.

[13]  Lisiane Pruinelli,et al.  Advancing Nursing Informatics in the Next Decade: Recommendations from an International Survey , 2016, Nursing Informatics.

[14]  B. Drew,et al.  Insights into the Problem of Alarm Fatigue with Physiologic Monitor Devices: A Comprehensive Observational Study of Consecutive Intensive Care Unit Patients , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  David W Bates,et al.  Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry. , 2010, Health affairs.

[16]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  InSook Cho,et al.  Comparing usability testing outcomes and functions of six electronic nursing record systems , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[18]  C. Schoen,et al.  A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. , 2012, Health affairs.

[19]  Crystal L Rojas,et al.  The Informatics Nurse Specialist Role in Electronic Health Record Usability Evaluation , 2014, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[20]  Michelle L. Rogers,et al.  Use of a human factors approach to uncover informatics needs of nurses in documentation of care , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Review of health information technology usability study methodologies , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  R. A. Paulus,et al.  Electronic Health Record Adoption among Obstetrician/Gynecologists in the United States: Physician Practices and Satisfaction , 2017, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[23]  Avi Parush,et al.  The EHR and building the patient's story: A qualitative investigation of how EHR use obstructs a vital clinical activity , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  Adam Wright,et al.  What makes an EHR "open" or interoperable? , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  Paulina S. Sockolow,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Electronic Health Records on Nurse Clinical Process at Two Community Health Sites , 2012, Nursing Informatics.

[26]  H. Turunen,et al.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. , 2013, Nursing & health sciences.

[27]  Evelyn J. S. Hovenga,et al.  Nursing constraint models for electronic health records: A vision for domain knowledge governance , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[28]  K. Bowles,et al.  Educating Clinicians on New Elements Incorporated Into the Electronic Health Record: Theories, Evidence, and One Educational Project , 2013, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[29]  Stephen H Walsh.  The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.