Localization in Reverberation with Cochlear Implants

Users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) experience difficulties localizing sounds in reverberant rooms, even in rooms where normal-hearing listeners would hardly notice the reverberation. We measured the localization ability of seven bilateral CI users listening with their own devices in anechoic space and in a simulated reverberant room. To determine factors affecting performance in reverberant space we measured the sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and forward masking in the same participants using direct computer control of the electric stimulation in their CIs. Localization performance, quantified by the coefficient of determination r2 and the root mean squared error, was significantly worse in the reverberant room than in anechoic conditions. Localization performance in the anechoic room, expressed as r2, was best predicted by subject’s sensitivity to ILDs. However, the decrease in localization performance caused by reverberation was better predicted by the sensitivity to envelope ITDs measured on single electrode pairs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.92. The CI users who were highly sensitive to envelope ITDs also better maintained their localization ability in reverberant space. Results in the forward masking task added only marginally to the predictions of localization performance in both environments. The results indicate that envelope ITDs provided by CI processors support localization in reverberant space. Thus, methods that improve perceptual access to envelope ITDs could help improve localization with bilateral CIs in everyday listening situations.

[1]  C S Throckmorton,et al.  Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[4]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[5]  Bernhard U. Seeber,et al.  A test battery to assess localization ability in simulated complex acoustic environments. , 2010 .

[6]  H Steven Colburn,et al.  The influence of spectral, temporal, and interaural stimulus variations on the precedence effect. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[8]  H. Gaskell The precedence effect , 1983, Hearing Research.

[9]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.

[10]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Spatial Hearing and Speech Intelligibility in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[11]  R. V. van Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Localization of High‐Frequency Tones , 1957 .

[13]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Interaural Time and Level Difference Thresholds for Acoustically Presented Signals in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Fitted with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using CIS+ Processing , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[14]  R. V. van Hoesel Exploring the Benefits of Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[15]  Bernhard U. Seeber,et al.  A system to simulate and reproduce audio–visual environments for spatial hearing research , 2010, Hearing Research.

[16]  W. Yost,et al.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Colette M. McKay,et al.  Psychophysics and Electrical Stimulation , 2004 .

[18]  B. Seeber,et al.  Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Lutman,et al.  Learning to discriminate interaural time differences: An exploratory study with amplitude-modulated stimuli , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[20]  S. Laugesen,et al.  Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities? , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Jace Wolfe,et al.  Programming Cochlear Implants , 2010 .

[22]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Effects of Reverberation on the Directional Sensitivity of Auditory Neurons across the Tonotopic Axis: Influences of Interaural Time and Level Differences , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Jörg M. Buchholz,et al.  Characterizing the monaural and binaural processes underlying reflection masking , 2007, Hearing Research.

[25]  James F Patrick,et al.  The Development of the Nucleus® Freedom™ Cochlear Implant System , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[26]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients’ performance with advanced speech training procedures , 2008, Hearing Research.

[29]  D. Grantham,et al.  Horizontal-Plane Localization of Noise and Speech Signals by Postlingually Deafened Adults Fitted With Bilateral Cochlear Implants* , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[30]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R V Shannon,et al.  Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Stimulus-onset dominance in the perception of binaural information , 1994, Hearing Research.

[33]  Bernhard U. Seeber,et al.  A New Method for Localization Studies , 2002 .

[34]  Hari M. Bharadwaj,et al.  Report Why Middle-aged Listeners Have Trouble Hearing in Everyday Settings , 2022 .

[35]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms, III: Onset and duration effects. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. V. Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007 .

[39]  Bernhard Laback,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Level and Envelope Time Differences of Two Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners Using Clinical Sound Processors , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[40]  Stefan Kerber,et al.  Sound Localization in Noise by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[41]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[42]  Constantine Trahiotis,et al.  How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  H Steven Colburn,et al.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Bernhard U Seeber,et al.  Failure of the precedence effect with a noise-band vocoder. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.