Computer simulation of BTEX emission in natural gas dehydration using PR and RKS equations of state with different predictive mixing rules

Abstract A typical natural gas dehydration plant, which employs triethylene glycol (TEG) as the dehydrating agent, is simulated using a steady state flowsheeting simulator (Aspen Plus). All major units were included in the flowsheet, that is: absorption column, flash unit, heat exchangers, regenerator, stripper, and reboiler. The base case operating conditions are taken to resemble field data from one of the existing dehydration units operating in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). To explore effects of the thermodynamic model employed in the simulator on the reliability of the whole simulation process, different predictive mixing rules applied to two cubic equations of state (EOS), as programmed by the simulator, have been investigated. The EOS used in the simulation is the Redlich–Kwong–Soave (RKS) and the Peng–Robinson (PR), both with Boston–Mathias (BM) alpha function. In addition to the classical empirical mixing rules, the following ones are investigated: Predictive Soave–Redlich–Kwong–Gmehling (PRKS), Wong–Sandler (WS), and Modified-Huron–Vidal (MHV2) mixing rules. These mixing rules are all predictive in nature. The plant performance criteria that have been studied for their response to changes in the solvent circulation rate include: BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes) emissions rate, desiccant losses (makeup), water content in the dehumidified natural gas, purity of the regenerated TEG, and reboiler heat duty. Comparison with the field data is done. Very diverse results have been obtained from the different models and mixing rules. No one single model gives the best results for all criteria.

[1]  D. Wong,et al.  Accurate equation of state predictions at high temperatures and pressures using the existing UNIFAC model , 1993 .

[3]  Stanley I. Sandler,et al.  Modeling Vapor-Liquid Equilibria: Cubic Equations of State and their Mixing Rules , 1998 .

[4]  J. Vidal Mixing rules and excess properties in cubic equations of state , 1978 .

[5]  M. Huron,et al.  New mixing rules in simple equations of state for representing vapour-liquid equilibria of strongly non-ideal mixtures☆ , 1979 .

[6]  D. Peng,et al.  A New Two-Constant Equation of State , 1976 .

[7]  J. Gmehling,et al.  PSRK: A Group Contribution Equation of State Based on UNIFAC , 1991 .

[8]  Thomas J. Ahrens,et al.  Equation of State , 1993 .

[9]  David Shan-Hill Wong,et al.  A theoretically correct mixing rule for cubic equations of state , 1992 .

[10]  S. Sandler,et al.  Equation of state mixing rule for nonideal mixtures using available activity coefficient model parameters and that allows extrapolation over large ranges of temperature and pressure , 1992 .

[11]  G. Soave Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state , 1972 .

[12]  D. L. Gallup,et al.  Use of Ambersorb® carbonaceous adsorbent for removal of BTEX compounds from oil‐field produced water , 1996 .

[13]  N. C. Patel,et al.  Mixing rules for van-der-Waals type equation of state based on thermodynamic perturbation theory , 1998 .

[14]  O. Redlich,et al.  On the thermodynamics of solutions; an equation of state; fugacities of gaseous solutions. , 1949, Chemical reviews.

[15]  M. Michelsen,et al.  High‐pressure vapor‐liquid equilibrium with a UNIFAC‐based equation of state , 1990 .