Predicting biological condition in southern California streams

Abstract As understanding of the complex relations among environmental stressors and biological responses improves, a logical next step is predictive modeling of biological condition at unsampled sites. We developed a boosted regression tree (BRT) model of biological condition, as measured by a benthic macroinvertebrate index of biotic integrity (BIBI), for streams in urbanized Southern Coastal California. We also developed a multiple linear regression (MLR) model as a benchmark for comparison with the BRT model. The BRT model explained 66% of the variance in B-IBI, identifying watershed population density and combined percentage agricultural and urban land cover in the riparian buffer as the most important predictors of B-IBI, but with watershed mean precipitation and watershed density of manmade channels also important. The MLR model explained 48% of the variance in B-IBI and included watershed population density and combined percentage agricultural and urban land cover in the riparian buffer. For a verification data set, the BRT model correctly classified 75% of impaired sites (B-IBI

[1]  C. Hawkins.  Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessments. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  Classifying the biological condition of small streams: an example using benthic macroinvertebrates , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Anthropogenic disturbance and streams: land use and land‐use change affect stream ecosystems via multiple pathways , 2011 .

[4]  John Van Sickle,et al.  PROJECTING THE BIOLOGICAL CONDITION OF STREAMS UNDER ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS OF HUMAN LAND USE , 2004 .

[5]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  C. Zamora‐Muñoz,et al.  The MEDiterranean Prediction And Classification System (MEDPACS): an implementation of the RIVPACS/AUSRIVAS predictive approach for assessing Mediterranean aquatic macroinvertebrate communities , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Assessment of european streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish : a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress , 2006 .

[8]  W. Johnston,et al.  Whither California Agriculture: Up, Down, or Out? Some Thoughts about the Future , 2004 .

[9]  Soon-Jin Hwang,et al.  Landscape ecological approach to the relationships of land use patterns in watersheds to water quality characteristics , 2009 .

[10]  Alison H. Purcell,et al.  Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[11]  A. Prasad,et al.  Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction , 2006, Ecosystems.

[12]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2005 .

[13]  Elizabeth D. Baldwin,et al.  Assessing risk of large-scale habitat conversion in lightly settled landscapes , 2009 .

[14]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  SAS® System for Regression , 2001 .

[15]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Comparisons of targeted-riffle and reach-wide benthic macroinvertebrate samples: implications for data sharing in stream-condition assessments , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  Thomas F Cuffney,et al.  Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental changes associated with urbanization in nine metropolitan areas. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  H. Akaike.  Likelihood of a model and information criteria , 1981 .

[18]  Chris O. Yoder,et al.  Measuring the attainment of biological integrity in the USA: a critical element of ecological integrity , 2000 .

[19]  L. Brown.  Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems , 2005 .

[20]  N. Prat,et al.  A comparison of rapid bioassessment protocols used in 2 regions with Mediterranean climates, the Iberian Peninsula and South Africa , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[21]  J. Paruelo,et al.  How to evaluate models : Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? , 2008 .

[22]  Elias S. Manolakos,et al.  Instream and offstream environmental conditions and stream biotic integrity: Importance of scale and site similarities for learning and prediction , 2009 .

[23]  M. Gregory,et al.  Relation of urbanization to stream fish assemblages and species traits in nine metropolitan areas of the United States , 2009, Urban Ecosystems.

[24]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[25]  Thomas R. Schueler,et al.  Is Impervious Cover Still Important? Review of Recent Research , 2009 .

[26]  J. Allan.  Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[27]  Daren M. Carlisle,et al.  Quantifying human disturbance in watersheds: Variable selection and performance of a GIS-based disturbance index for predicting the biological condition of perennial streams , 2010 .

[28]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[29]  K. N. Eshleman,et al.  Variation in physicochemical responses to urbanization in streams between two Mid-Atlantic physiographic regions. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[30]  V. Shandas,et al.  Exploring the role of vegetation fragmentation on aquatic conditions: Linking upland with riparian areas in Puget Sound lowland streams , 2009 .

[31]  The Effects of Urbanization and Other Environmental Gradients on Algal Assemblages in Nine Metropolitan Areas across the United States , 2009 .

[32]  J. Friedman.  Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[33]  Eric D. Stein,et al.  Estimating the Variability and Confidence of Land Use and Imperviousness Relationships at a Regional Scale1 , 2008 .

[34]  S. Qian,et al.  Multilevel regression models describing regional patterns of invertebrate and algal responses to urbanization across the USA , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[35]  W. Shuster,et al.  Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review , 2005 .

[36]  C. Yoder,et al.  The biotic integrity of streams in urban and suburbanizing landscapes , 2004 .

[37]  M. Alberti,et al.  The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins , 2007 .

[38]  Thomas F. Cuffney,et al.  Comparison of watershed disturbance predictive models for stream benthic macroinvertebrates for three distinct ecoregions in western US , 2010 .

[39]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[40]  Michael W. Binford,et al.  Examining development-related uncertainties for environmental management: Strategic planning scenarios in Southern California , 2006 .

[41]  Karen M. Beaulieu,et al.  Determining hydrologic factors that influence stream macroinvertebrate assemblages in the northeastern US , 2009 .

[42]  S. Linke,et al.  Systematic planning for river rehabilitation: integrating multiple ecological and economic objectives in complex decisions , 2012 .

[43]  P. Ode,et al.  A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams , 2005, Environmental management.

[44]  Donald Edward,et al.  AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia , 1999 .

[45]  John R. Olson,et al.  The reference condition: predicting benchmarks for ecological and water-quality assessments , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[46]  Thomas F. Cuffney,et al.  Comparison of Stream Invertebrate Response Models for Bioassessment Metrics 1 , 2012 .

[47]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Classification and regression , 1997 .

[48]  Thomas F. Cuffney,et al.  QUANTIFYING URBAN INTENSITY IN DRAINAGE BASINS FOR ASSESSING STREAM ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS 1 , 2000 .

[49]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency , 2008 .

[50]  G. De’ath.  Boosted trees for ecological modeling and prediction. , 2007, Ecology.

[51]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[52]  A. H. Bell,et al.  Urban streams across the USA: lessons learned from studies in 9 metropolitan areas , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[53]  P. Groffman,et al.  The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[54]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[55]  T. W. Barrett,et al.  Planning for the persistence of river biodiversity: exploring alternative futures using process‐based models , 2011 .

[56]  R. Kashuba.  Bayesian Methods to Characterize Uncertainty in Predictive Modeling of the Effect of Urbanization on Aquatic Ecosystems , 2010 .

[57]  B. Muys,et al.  Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests , 2010 .

[58]  S. Gao,et al.  Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources , 2009 .

[59]  D. Carlisle,et al.  Predicting the biological condition of streams: use of geospatial indicators of natural and anthropogenic characteristics of watersheds , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.