State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China

ABSTRACT Despite the prevalence of global diffusion, little is known about the processes by which international practices are adopted and adapted within organizations around the world. Through our qualitative research on the introduction of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting at two leading Chinese companies, we identify a unique set of political mechanisms that we label state-mediated globalization, whereby powerful nation-state actors influence the ways in which corporations adopt and adapt global norms and practices. We find that businesses’ needs for political legitimacy from a key stakeholder, in this case the government, leads them to deviate systematically from the global practice in both form and content. These intentional practice adaptations are then legitimized by the government to create internationalization tools and localized standards to aid adoption by other organizations. Our findings illustrate previously unidentified mechanisms by which powerful stakeholders such as the Chinese government may mediate, and thereby direct, the ways in which corporations adopt and adapt global CSR practices. Contributions to understanding the political processes of institutional translation in the context of globalization are discussed.

[1]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance? , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Jin Yan Construction and Development of Video Conference System of State Grid Corporation of China(SGCC) , 2011 .

[3]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms , 2015 .

[4]  James J. Cordeiro,et al.  International and domestic pressures and responses of Chinese firms to greening , 2012 .

[5]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[6]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[7]  K. Lai,et al.  How is Employee Perception of Organizational Efforts in Corporate Social Responsibility Related to Their Satisfaction and Loyalty Towards Developing Harmonious Society in Chinese Enterprises , 2014 .

[8]  Yongqiang Gao,et al.  Corporate Social Performance in China: Evidence from Large Companies , 2009 .

[9]  Junmin Wang Global-market building as state building: China’s entry into the WTO and market reforms of China’s tobacco industry , 2009 .

[10]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , 2017 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[12]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  State-owned Enterprises Around the WORLD as Hybrid Organizations , 2015 .

[13]  Yuhuan Liu,et al.  Stakeholder Influences and Organization Responses: A Case Study of Corporate Social Responsibility Suspension , 2015, Management and Organization Review.

[14]  John Child,et al.  The Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical Extension? , 2005 .

[15]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[16]  Maria B. Gondo,et al.  Variations in Practice Adoption: The Roles of Conscious Reflection and Discourse , 2012 .

[17]  S. L. Sun,et al.  An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises , 2015 .

[18]  Bin Wu,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Under Authoritarian Capitalism: Dynamics and Prospects of State-Led and Society-Driven CSR , 2017 .

[19]  Eric Gedajlovic,et al.  Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise , 2009 .

[20]  D. Jamali A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[21]  Ilya Okhmatovskiy,et al.  Setting Your Own Standards: Internal Corporate Governance Codes as a Response to Institutional Pressure , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[22]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Kerstin Sahlin,et al.  Circulating ideas : Imitation, translation and editing , 2008 .

[24]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[25]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[26]  Doreen J. McBarnet,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Beyond Law, Through Law, for Law: The New Corporate Accountability , 2008 .

[27]  Jeff Frooman Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[28]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age , 1994 .

[29]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Legacies of Logics: Sources of Community Variation in CSR Implementation in China , 2012 .

[30]  K. Rajandran,et al.  The representation of CSR in Malaysian CEO statements: a critical discourse analysis , 2014 .

[31]  P. Hofman,et al.  The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: evidence from China , 2014 .

[32]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  INSTITUTIONALIZATION, FRAMING, AND DIFFUSION: THE LOGIC OF TQM ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION DECISIONS AMONG U.S. HOSPITALS , 2009 .

[33]  Fabrizio Ferraro,et al.  The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[34]  R. E. Freeman,et al.  Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance , 1983 .

[35]  Mia Raynard,et al.  Institutional Strategies in Emerging Markets , 2014 .

[36]  Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China , 2012 .

[37]  T. Khanna,et al.  Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets , 1997 .

[38]  Shahzad Ansari,et al.  How are Practices Made to Vary? Managing Practice Adaptation in a Multinational Corporation , 2014 .

[39]  Meng Zhao CSR-Based Political Legitimacy Strategy: Managing the State by Doing Good in China and Russia , 2012 .

[40]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[41]  T. Campbell,et al.  The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law , 2007 .

[42]  Institutional Logics in Action. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 39A , 2013 .

[43]  Li-Wen Lin,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in China: Window Dressing or Structural Change? , 2009 .

[44]  Geoffrey See,et al.  Harmonious Society and Chinese CSR: Is There Really a Link? , 2009 .

[45]  Philippe Gugler,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility for Developing Country Multinational Corporations: Lost War in Pertaining Global Competitiveness? , 2009 .

[46]  J. M. Macpherson,et al.  Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates , 2002 .

[47]  B. Dickson Red Capitalists in China: The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change , 2003 .

[48]  M. Frenkel,et al.  The Politics of Translation: How State-Level Political Relations Affect the Cross-National Travel of Management Ideas , 2005 .

[49]  John W. Meyer,et al.  World Society and the Nation‐State , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Stephen J. Jaros,et al.  Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective , 1994 .

[51]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  Made to Fit: How Practices Vary as They Diffuse , 2014 .

[52]  B. Dickson Red Capitalists in China: Frontmatter , 2003 .

[53]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[54]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[55]  A. Toppinen,et al.  ISO 26000 in the assessment of CSR communication quality: CEO letters and social media in the global pulp and paper industry , 2015 .

[56]  N. Subramaniam,et al.  Governance of Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Indian Government-owned Firms , 2017 .