Influence of photon beam energy on IMRT plan quality for radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Summary Background Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been widely used for prostate cancer treatments. 6MV photon beams were found to be an effective energy choice for most IMRT cases. The use of high-energy photons raise concerns about increased leakage and secondary neutron dose for the patients. Aim In this work, the effect of beam energy on the quality of IMRT plans for prostate radiotherapy was systematically studied for competing IMRT plans optimized for delivery with either 6 or 10MV beams. Materials and Methods A cohort of 20 prostate cases was selected for this study. All patients received full-course IMRT treatments to a dose of 79.2Gy to PTV in 44 fractions. For all of the cases we developed treatment plans using 6 MV and 10MV intensity-modulated beams with identical dose volume constraints. Results Percentage of doses received by the percentage volume of PTV was higher for 6MV photons compared to 10MV photons for 12 patients, less than or equal to 1% for 6 patients and 2.6%, 3.6% for the remaining 2 patients irrespective of the PTV volume. Percentage doses received by 15% of bladder volume were higher for 10 MV photons. Percentage doses received by 15% of rectum volume were also higher for 10 MV photons. Conclusions Since there is no greater advantage from 10MV photons as compared with 6MV photons in large volume pelvic IMRT dosimetry and also 10MV photons lie on the threshold energy border for the induction of photo neutrons from the accelerator components, we recommend the use of 6MV photons for IMRT of prostate cancer to achieve better results in tumour control and acceptable probability of complication rate.

[1]  Steve Webb,et al.  Clinical implementation of dynamic and step-and-shoot IMRT to treat prostate cancer with high risk of pelvic lymph node involvement. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT , 2003, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  C. Ling,et al.  Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  G. Fullerton,et al.  Investigation of secondary neutron dose for 18 MV dynamic MLC IMRT delivery. , 2005, Medical physics.

[5]  Lijun Ma,et al.  Treatment of exceptionally large prostate cancer patients with low‐energy intensity‐modulated photons , 2006, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[6]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Clinical experience with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of rectal balloon for prostate immobilization. , 2002, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[7]  W. De Neve,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer: acute toxicity in 114 patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  G. Ceresoli,et al.  Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer. , 2003, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[9]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Technological advances in external-beam radiation therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[10]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Comparison between manual and automatic segment generation in step-and-shoot IMRT of prostate cancer. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  David S Followill,et al.  Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Hazim Jaradat,et al.  Integral radiation dose to normal structures with conformal external beam radiation. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  C C Ling,et al.  Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Choice of optimum megavoltage for accelerators for photon beam treatment. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Benjamin Movsas,et al.  A method for increased dose conformity and segment reduction for SMLC delivered IMRT treatment of the prostate. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  H. Sandler,et al.  Optimization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[17]  D Followill,et al.  Estimates of whole-body dose equivalent produced by beam intensity modulated conformal therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  An analysis of 6-MV versus 18-MV photon energy plans for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of lung cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  J Wong,et al.  Improvement in dose escalation using the process of adaptive radiotherapy combined with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated beams for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  D Andrew Loblaw,et al.  Individualized planning target volumes for intrafraction motion during hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  W. Schlegel,et al.  Inverse planning and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. , 2002, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[22]  Barbara Vanderstraeten,et al.  Comparison of 6 MV and 18 MV photons for IMRT treatment of lung cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  M. Podgorsak,et al.  The Effect of Beam Energy on the Quality of IMRT Plans for Prostate Conformal Radiotherapy , 2007, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[24]  X A Li,et al.  Optimized intensity‐modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer treatment , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[25]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Comparison of dose distributions in patients treated with x-ray beams of widely different energies. , 1952, Radiology.

[26]  S. Söderström,et al.  Aspects on the optimal photon beam energy for radiation therapy. , 1999, Acta oncologica.

[27]  Ping Xia,et al.  The effect of beam energy and number of fields on photon-based IMRT for deep-seated targets. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Gary D Fullerton,et al.  Calculation of effective dose from measurements of secondary neutron spectra and scattered photon dose from dynamic MLC IMRT for 6 MV, 15 MV, and 18 MV beam energies. , 2006, Medical physics.