Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients.

OBJECT Despite a history of safety and efficacy, spinal anesthesia is rarely used in lumbar surgery. Application of regional anesthetics is widely preferred for lower-extremity surgery, but general anesthesia is used almost exclusively in spine surgery, despite evidence that spinal anesthesia is as safe and may offer some advantages. METHODS In this case-controlled study the authors analyzed outcomes obtained in 400 patients in whom either spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia was induced to perform a lumbar decompression. Patients were matched for anesthesia-related class, preoperative diagnosis, surgical procedure, and perioperative protocols. All aspects of surgery, recovery, postanesthesia care, and pain management were uniform irrespective of the anesthetic type. Case complexity was equivalent. An independent observer performed analysis of the data. Data from the intraoperative period through hospital discharge were collected and compared. Two hundred consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in each group. Patients were treated for either lumbar stenosis or herniated nucleus pulposus. Demographically, both groups were well matched. Anesthetic and operative times were longer for patients receiving a general anesthetic (p < 0.05), in whom more nausea and greater requirements for antiemetics and pain medication were also present during recovery (p < 0.05). Overall complication rates and, specifically, the incidences of urinary retention were significantly lower in spinal anesthesia--induced patients (p < 0.05). There were no neural injuries in either group, and the incidence of spinal headache was lower in patients receiving a spinal anesthetic (1.5% compared with 3%). CONCLUSIONS Spinal anesthesia was as safe and effective as general anethesia for patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Potential advantages of spinal anesthsia include a shorter anesthesia duration, decreased nausea, antiemetic and analgesic requirements, and fewer complications. Successful surgery can be performed using either anesthesia type.

[1]  W. Jellish,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Short- and Intermediate-Term Perioperative Outcome Variables After Spinal or General Anesthesia for Lumbar Disk and Laminectomy Surgery , 1996, Anesthesia and Analgesia.

[2]  W. Jellish,et al.  Propofol-based anesthesia as compared with standard anesthetic techniques for middle ear surgery. , 1995, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[3]  J. Tetzlaff,et al.  Influence of Baricity on the Outcome of Spinal Anesthesia With Bupivacaine for Lumbar Spine Surgery , 1995, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[4]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Regional anaesthesia and surgical morbidity. , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  P. White,et al.  Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Its Etiology, Treatment, and Prevention , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[6]  J. Tetzlaff,et al.  Spinal anesthesia with plain bupivicaine for lumbar spine surgery. , 1990, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[7]  G. Bannister,et al.  Control of bleeding in cemented arthroplasty. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  O. Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Multiple identical stress fractures in monozygotic twins. Case report. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  B. Covino,et al.  RATIONALE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA , 1989, International anesthesiology clinics.

[10]  J. Dundee,et al.  The antiemetic action of propofol , 1988, Anaesthesia.

[11]  N. H. Mann,et al.  Epidural anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery. , 1988, Journal of spinal disorders.

[12]  W. Gillespie,et al.  Metabolic response to total hip arthroplasty under hypobaric subarachnoid or general anaesthesia. , 1987, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  David V. Young,et al.  Comparison of local, spinal, and general anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy. , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[14]  C. Hickton,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SPINAL AND GENERAL ANAESTHESIA ON HAEMOSTASIS DURING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY , 1987 .

[15]  M. Davies,et al.  A Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing Spinal Anaesthesia using Hyperbaric Cinchocaine with General Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Vascular Surgery , 1986, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[16]  J. Halter,et al.  Effect of Spinal Anesthesia on Adrenergic Tone and the Neuroendocrine Responses to Surgical Stress in Humans , 1981, Anesthesiology.

[17]  J. Thorburn,et al.  Spinal and general anaesthesia in total hip replacement: frequency of deep vein thrombosis. , 1980, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  D. Scott,et al.  Gastric emptying following hysterectomy with extradural analgesia. , 1978, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  J. Riding Minor complications of general anaesthesia. , 1975, British journal of anaesthesia.