Development of students’ conceptual thinking by means of video analysis and interactive simulations at technical universities

Video analysis, using the program Tracker (Open Source Physics), in the educational process introduces a new creative method of teaching physics and makes natural sciences more interesting for students. This way of exploring the laws of nature can amaze students because this illustrative and interactive educational software inspires them to think creatively, improves their performance and helps them in studying physics. This paper deals with increasing the key competencies in engineering by analysing real-life situation videos – physical problems – by means of video analysis and the modelling tools using the program Tracker and simulations of physical phenomena from The Physics Education Technology (PhET™) Project (VAS method of problem tasks). The statistical testing using the t-test confirmed the significance of the differences in the knowledge of the experimental and control groups, which were the result of interactive method application.

[1]  Kenneth H. Smith.  The Inviting Professional Educator: A Reflective Practitioner and Action Researcher. , 2010 .

[2]  Aruna Shekar,et al.  Active learning and reflection in product development engineering education , 2007 .

[3]  Peter Hockicko,et al.  Nontraditional Approach to Studying Science and Technology , 2010, Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina.

[4]  Wim Ravesteijn,et al.  Training complete engineers: Global enterprise and engineering education , 2001 .

[5]  Teresa Martín-Blas,et al.  Enhancing Force Concept Inventory diagnostics to identify dominant misconceptions in first-year engineering physics , 2010 .

[6]  Cedric Linder,et al.  Equipment issues regarding the collection of video data for research. , 2005 .

[7]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[8]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[9]  L. V. Dijk,et al.  Interactive lectures in engineering education , 2001 .

[10]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills , 1996 .

[11]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[12]  Carlinda Leite,et al.  A place for arguing in engineering education: a study on students’ assessments , 2011 .

[13]  Kenneth Gavin,et al.  Case study of a project-based learning course in civil engineering design , 2011 .

[14]  Theodore F. Wiesner,et al.  Comparison of Student Learning in Physical and Simulated Unit Operations Experiments , 2004 .

[15]  Louis Moreau de Bellaing.  Paternalisme et contestation , 1968 .

[16]  Harvard Scott Hinton,et al.  Virtual circuit laboratory , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).

[17]  D K Nachtigall.  What is wrong with physics teachers' education? , 1990 .

[18]  Christian Thomsen,et al.  A practical approach for applying online remote experiments: OnPReX , 2011 .

[19]  C. Wieman,et al.  PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics , 2006 .

[20]  Joseph Carroll,et al.  A User’s Manual , 2012 .

[21]  Erica Macho-Stadler,et al.  Case study of a problem-based learning course of physics in a telecommunications engineering degree , 2013 .

[22]  André Heck,et al.  In a Hurry to Work with High‐Speed Video at School? , 2010 .

[23]  Teklu Abate Bekele,et al.  Motivation and Satisfaction in Internet-Supported Learning Environments: A Review , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[24]  Cristina G. Oliveira,et al.  Using conceptual questions to promote motivation and learning in physics lectures , 2013 .

[25]  Ján Stebila,et al.  INTERACTIVE P&E METHOD IN TEACHING PHYSICS AT SECONDARY SCHOOLS , 2013 .

[26]  C. Wieman,et al.  Teaching Physics Using PhET Simulations. , 2010 .

[28]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment , 1997 .

[29]  Jose P. Mestre,et al.  Learning and Instruction in Pre‐College Physical Science , 1991 .

[30]  Alain Haché,et al.  A Cool Sport Full of Physics , 2008 .

[31]  Veronica Cahyadi,et al.  The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of Surabaya, Indonesia , 2004 .

[32]  Rebecca Francis,et al.  Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes , 2013 .

[33]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment , 2005 .

[34]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[35]  Marie Schmidt,et al.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1992 .

[36]  A. Cox,et al.  Innovative Uses of Video Analysis , 2009 .

[37]  Zuzana Danihelová,et al.  Interactive Methods of Teaching Physics at Technical Universities , 2014, Informatics Educ..

[38]  C. Baillie,et al.  Motivation and attrition in engineering students , 2000 .

[39]  A. Ahern,et al.  Critical thinking in the university curriculum – the impact on engineering education , 2012 .

[40]  Jesús Félez,et al.  Experiences in education innovation: developing tools in support of active learning , 2006 .

[41]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations , 2010 .

[42]  H. Sluiter.  [Learning by doing]. , 1977, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[43]  G. V. Madhuri,et al.  Promoting higher order thinking skills using inquiry-based learning , 2012 .

[44]  Gregg L. Fiegel.  Incorporating learning outcomes into an introductory geotechnical engineering course , 2013 .

[45]  John R. Bourne,et al.  The Effectiveness of Learning Simulations for Electronic Laboratories , 2002 .

[46]  Bjarne Schmidt,et al.  Teaching engineering dynamics by use of peer instruction supported by an audience response system , 2011 .

[47]  Chunfang Zhou,et al.  Fostering creative engineers: a key to face the complexity of engineering practice , 2012 .

[48]  Chenicheri Sid Nair,et al.  Enhancing the quality of engineering education by utilising student feedback , 2011 .

[49]  D. Nicol,et al.  Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom , 2003 .

[50]  David Taylor.  Death by PowerPoint , 2007 .

[51]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[52]  J. G. WILSON,et al.  Teaching Physics , 1967, Nature.

[53]  Ján Stebila.  Research and prediction of the application of multimedia teaching aid in teaching technical education on the 2nd level of primary schools , 2011, Informatics Educ..

[54]  M. Lightner,et al.  Virtual Circuit Laboratory * , 2001 .