Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects.

A maximum-likelihood method was applied in measurements of frequency and intensity discrimination for aged and young normal-hearing subjects with closely matched audiograms. This method was preferred over other psychophysical procedures because it is efficient and controls experimental variance, features that are highly desirable for testing aged subjects. In order to implement the method, psychometric functions for each task were also measured from young subjects using a constant-stimuli procedure. For the young subjects, the differential thresholds obtained from these two procedures were generally comparable. Further, both sets of data were consistent with previous literature, indicating that the maximum-likelihood method was successfully applied for frequency and intensity discrimination. A frequency-dependent difference between young and aged subjects in both frequency and intensity discrimination was observed. Even with closely matched audiograms, aged subjects demonstrated poorer discrimination abilities than young subjects. The age-related difference was always largest at 500 Hz and decreased as frequency increased.

[1]  P W Alberti,et al.  Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Recovery from prior stimulation II: Effects upon intensity discrimination , 1991, Hearing Research.

[3]  R. Luce,et al.  Neural coding and psychophysical discrimination data. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D. M. Green,et al.  A two-filter model for frequency discrimination , 1995, Hearing Research.

[5]  D A Nelson,et al.  Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J Nachmias,et al.  Intensity discrimination with gated and continuous sinusoids. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  So,et al.  An excitation‐pattern model for intensity discrimination , 1981 .

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Neal F. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity coding and the dynamic range problem , 1988, Hearing Research.

[11]  D. M. Green,et al.  A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  W. J. McGill,et al.  Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D M Green,et al.  Further studies of a maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  B C Moore,et al.  Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D A Nelson,et al.  Frequency discrimination in regions of normal and impaired sensitivity. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  M. Florentine,et al.  Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  C M Reed,et al.  Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. M. Green,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R L Freyman,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of signal frequency and level in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  F. Zeng,et al.  Intensity discrimination in forward masking. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  E. König,et al.  Pitch discrimination and age. , 1957 .

[22]  B. Moore Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  S Buus,et al.  Psychometric functions for level discrimination in cochlearly impaired and normal listeners with equivalent-threshold masking. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  J. Mills,et al.  Extended high-frequency thresholds in older adults. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[25]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  S Buus,et al.  Psychometric functions for level discrimination. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R. R. Riesz Differential Intensity Sensitivity of the Ear for Pure Tones , 1928 .

[28]  D M Green,et al.  Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  D. M. Green,et al.  Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Intensity perception. VI. Summary of recent data on deviations from Weber's law for 1000-Hz tone pulses. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R. Freyman,et al.  A general equation describing frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  R. Freyman,et al.  Psychometric functions for frequency discrimination from listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  M Florentine,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.