Optimization of reinforcement strategies for dangerous dams considering time-average system failure probability and benefit–cost ratio using a life quality index

Lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization for structural reinforcement based on series-system reliability and benefit–cost analysis has already been proposed. It is still needed, however, to incorporate the life quality index (LQI) in the lifetime reinforcement optimization process of complex massive infrastructure engineering with correlated series–parallel failure modes (e.g., dams). An improved technique combining overall system failure probability with benefit–cost analysis based on the LQI is developed. An approach to obtain time-average system failure probability with correlated series–parallel failure modes is proposed to measure the structural performance. Then, the concept for benefit–cost ratio based on LQI including failure consequence and life quality objective is introduced. As an application of the methodology, the optimal reinforcement strategy for an existing earth dam is shown. Three types of reinforcement strategies, that is, preventive reinforcement, essential reinforcement and that lies between them, are selected. The results show that the preventive reinforcement strategy is the most beneficial for a dam, whose failure loss involving human life is tremendous. The advantage of the proposed approach is its ability to harmonize overall structural safety with reinforcement cost and can be extended to optimization of reinforcement strategies for other massive infrastructure engineering projects.

[1]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of structural maintenance considering system reliability, redundancy and life-cycle cost using GA , 2009 .

[2]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Optimization of bridge maintenance strategies based on multiple limit states and monitoring , 2010 .

[3]  J. Vrijling,et al.  Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method , 2008 .

[4]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Breaching Parameters for Earth and Rockfill Dams , 2009 .

[5]  M. Pandey,et al.  Canada Wide Standard for Particulate Matter and Ozone: Cost‐Benefit Analysis Using a Life Quality Index , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Risk acceptance and maintenance optimization of aging civil engineering infrastructures , 2009 .

[7]  Marc A. Maes,et al.  Harmonizing structural safety levels with life- quality objectives , 2003 .

[8]  Jatin Nathwani,et al.  The LQI standard of practice: optimizing engineered safety with the Life Quality Index , 2008 .

[9]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances , 1986 .

[10]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Optimization of bridge maintenance strategies based on structural health monitoring information , 2011 .

[11]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  Service Life Predicting of Dam Systems with Correlated Failure Modes , 2013 .

[12]  Christian Bernstone,et al.  Structural Assessment of a Concrete Dam Based on Uplift Pressure Monitoring , 2009 .

[13]  Emir José Macari,et al.  Internal Erosion and Rehabilitation of an Earth-Rock Dam , 2011 .

[14]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Optimal and Acceptable Technical Facilities Involving Risks , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Mingchao Li,et al.  Dam break threshold value and risk probability assessment for an earth dam , 2011 .

[16]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  Evaluation model for service life of dam based on time-varying risk probability , 2009 .