A comparison of power and flow characteristics between batch and in-line rotor-stator mixers

Abstract Rotor-stator mixers are used in many industries to perform emulsification and de-agglomeration processes. Despite previous research, different modes of operation have not been compared in terms of flow and power characteristics. The aim of this study was to use CFD to investigate power and flow characteristics of a Silverson L5M mixer operating in batch and in-line mode. MRF was used along with the standard k - ∊ turbulence model for the simulations. Results suggest that batch mixers can be characterised in the same was as in-line mixers, and for a given mixing head design, the characterisation is independent of the mode of operation. A new way of the calculating flow number is proposed, which explains some discrepant results from previous studies. Overall, this work enhances our understanding of rotor-stator mixers and allows for better design choices of mixer.

[1]  A. Håkansson Rotor-Stator Mixers: From Batch to Continuous Mode of Operation—A Review , 2018 .

[2]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Scaling up of silverson rotor–stator mixers , 2011 .

[3]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  An expression for the power consumption of in-line rotor-stator devices , 2009 .

[4]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Power consumption characteristics of an in-line silverson high shear mixer , 2012 .

[5]  Andreas Håkansson,et al.  Hydrodynamic difference between inline and batch operation of a rotor-stator mixer head - A CFD approach , 2017 .

[6]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Power characteristics of in-line rotor stator mixers , 2014 .

[7]  A. Pagano,et al.  On the pressure losses through perforated plates , 2012 .

[8]  Andreas Håkansson,et al.  A validation of commonly used CFD methods applied to rotor stator mixers using PIV measurements of fluid velocity and turbulence , 2018 .

[9]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Expression for turbulent power draw of an in-line Silverson high shear mixer , 2011 .

[10]  Richard V. Calabrese,et al.  Rotor–Stator Mixing Devices , 2004 .

[11]  Peter Martin,et al.  Scale-up of batch rotor–stator mixers. Part 1—power constants , 2017 .

[12]  Gül Özcan-Taşkin,et al.  Power and flow characteristics of three rotor-stator heads , 2011 .

[13]  Andreas Håkansson,et al.  The effect of stator design on flowrate and velocity fields in a rotor-stator mixer—An experimental investigation , 2017 .

[14]  A. Pacek,et al.  The effect of stator geometry on the flow pattern and energy dissipation rate in a rotor-stator mixer , 2009 .

[15]  Elizabeth M. Marshall,et al.  Computational Fluid Mixing , 2004 .

[16]  Aliya Saperstein,et al.  Scaling Up , 2016 .

[17]  A. Pacek,et al.  Flow pattern, periodicity and energy dissipation in a batch rotor–stator mixer , 2008 .

[18]  T. Rodgers,et al.  Continuous, Recycle and Batch Emulsification Kinetics using a High-Shear Mixer , 2017 .

[19]  Derrick I. Ko,et al.  Flow and power characteristics of an axial discharge rotor-stator mixer , 2018, Chemical Engineering Research and Design.