Experimental Comparison of Transmission Performance for Nyquist WDM and Time–Frequency Packing

Several spectral efficient solutions for next-generation flexible optical networks are under investigation in order to cope with scalability issues while traffic demand is continuously increasing. Concerning transmission, Nyquist wavelength-division multiplexing (NWDM)-that confines the bandwidth within the Nyquist frequency of the signal-recently gained a momentum as one of the most suitable solutions for transmission over backbone networks and commercial solutions are available by now. Besides NWDM, other transmission techniques have been proposed to approach or overcome the Nyquist limit, thus further increasing the spectral efficiency (SE). Among them, time-frequency packing (TFP) is one candidate. This method builds a superchannel, whose subcarriers significantly overlap in frequency or time or both. This leads to an increased SE at the expenses of additional complexity within the transceiver to compensate for the introduced intersymbol interference. In this paper, we experimentally compare, for the first time, NWDM and TFP when employing the same identical test-bed. The experiment considered the two different terabit superchannels: a polarization multiplexed (PM)-16 quadrature amplitude modulation for the case of NWDM case, and a PM-quadrature phase-shift keying for TFP. The comparison and assessment of the results is carried out first in back-to-back configuration and, afterward, by propagating them over a recirculating loop consisting of a standard single-mode fiber, including spectrum selective switch to emulate node filtering.

[1]  Piero Castoldi,et al.  Next generation sliceable bandwidth variable transponders , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  Algorithms for iterative decoding in the presence of strong phase noise , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Maxim Kuschnerov,et al.  On the Mitigation of Optical Filtering Penalties Originating From ROADM Cascade , 2014, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[4]  Piero Castoldi,et al.  Programmable Transponder, Code and Differentiated Filter Configuration in Elastic Optical Networks , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[5]  Theofanis Orphanoudakis,et al.  Next generation optical nodes: The vision of the European research project IDEALIST , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Marc Bohn,et al.  Ultralong Haul 1.28-Tb/s PM-16QAM WDM Transmission Employing Hybrid Amplification , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  B. Spinnler,et al.  Long-haul terabit transmission (2272km) employing digitally pre-distorted quad-carrier PM-16QAM super-channel , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[8]  G. Berrettini,et al.  Casting 1 Tb/s DP-QPSK communication into 200 GHz bandwidth , 2012, 2012 38th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communications.

[9]  Antonella Bogoni,et al.  Sliceable transponder architecture including multiwavelength source , 2014, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[10]  Heinrich Meyr,et al.  Digital filter and square timing recovery , 1988, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  R. Cigliutti,et al.  16$\,\times\,$125 Gb/s Quasi-Nyquist DAC-Generated PM-16QAM Transmission Over 3590 km of PSCF , 2012, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[12]  P. Castoldi,et al.  Filter optimization in SDN-based flexgrid networks , 2014, OFC 2014.

[13]  Giulio Colavolpe,et al.  Time-Frequency Packing for High-Capacity Coherent Optical Links , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Dimitra Simeonidou,et al.  Finding the target cost for sliceable bandwidth variable transponders , 2014, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[15]  B. Spinnler,et al.  FEC overhead optimization for long-haul transmission of PM-16QAM based 400Gb/s super-channel , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[16]  Marc Bohn,et al.  Novel DAC digital pre-emphasis algorithm for next-generation flexible optical transponders , 2015, 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[17]  G. Prati,et al.  Robust Multilevel Coherent Optical Systems With Linear Processing at the Receiver , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[18]  Simon Poole,et al.  Bandwidth-flexible ROADMs as network elements , 2011, 2011 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[19]  Benyuan Zhu,et al.  Transmission Performance of 256-Gb/s PDM-16QAM With Different Amplification Schemes and Channel Spacings , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[20]  G. Ungerboeck,et al.  Adaptive Maximum-Likelihood Receiver for Carrier-Modulated Data-Transmission Systems , 1974, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[21]  Maxim Kuschnerov,et al.  Reduced Complexity Digital Back-Propagation Methods for Optical Communication Systems , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[22]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Multiflow optical transponder for efficient multilayer optical networking , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[23]  F. Hauske,et al.  DSP for Coherent Single-Carrier Receivers , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[24]  M Secondini,et al.  Sub-Nyquist field trial using time frequency packed DP-QPSK super-channel within fixed ITU-T grid. , 2015, Optics express.

[25]  N. Amaya,et al.  Experimental demonstration of elastic optical networking utilizing time-sliceable bitrate variable OFDM transceiver , 2014, OFC 2014.

[26]  Giulio Colavolpe Faster-than-Nyquist and beyond: how to improve spectral efficiency by accepting interference , 2011 .

[27]  Piero Castoldi,et al.  Toward high-rate and flexible optical networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[28]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Distance-adaptive spectrum resource allocation in spectrum-sliced elastic optical path network [Topics in Optical Communications] , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[29]  Giulio Colavolpe,et al.  Optical Time–Frequency Packing: Principles, Design, Implementation, and Experimental Demonstration , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[30]  Danish Rafique,et al.  Digital Preemphasis in Optical Communication Systems: On the DAC Requirements for Terabit Transmission Applications , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[31]  L. Potí,et al.  Impact of Optical and Electrical Narrowband Spectral Shaping in Faster Than Nyquist Tb Superchannel , 2013, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[32]  Dimitra Simeonidou,et al.  Next generation elastic optical networks: The vision of the European research project IDEALIST , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[33]  John Cocke,et al.  Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.) , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[34]  Joachim Hagenauer,et al.  The turbo principle-tutorial introduction and state of the art , 1997 .

[35]  Andrea Carena,et al.  1306-km 20x124.8-Gb/s PM-64QAM transmission over PSCF with Net SEDP 11,300 (b km)/s/Hz using 1.15 samp/symb DAC , 2013 .

[36]  H. de Waardt,et al.  Mitigation of filtering cascade penalties using spectral shaping in optical nodes , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[37]  P. Poggiolini,et al.  On the Performance of Nyquist-WDM Terabit Superchannels Based on PM-BPSK, PM-QPSK, PM-8QAM or PM-16QAM Subcarriers , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.