1 Against markedness ( and what to replace it with ) 1 MARTIN HASPELMATH

This paper first provides an overview of the various senses in which the terms "marked" and "unmarked" have been used in 20th century linguistics. Twelve different senses, related only by family resemblances, are distinguished, grouped into four larger classes: Markedness as complexity, as difficulty, as abnormality, and as a multidimensional correlation. In the second part of the paper, it is argued that the term "markedness" is superfluous, because some of the concepts that it denotes are not helpful, and others are better expressed by more straightforward, less ambiguous terms. In a great many cases, frequency asymmetries can be shown to lead to a direct explanation of observed structural asymmetries, and in other cases additional concrete, substantive factors such as phonetic difficulty and pragmatic inferences can replace references to an abstract notion of "markedness".

[1]  Fred R. Eckman.  MARKEDNESS AND THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESIS , 1977 .

[2]  W. Horn.  Sprachkörper und Sprachfunktion , 1921 .

[3]  R. Jakobson.  Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb , 1971 .

[4]  Michael Abecassis.  Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English, Geoffrey Leech, Paul Rayson and Andrew Wilson : book review , 2005 .

[5]  T. Givon.  Functionalism and Grammar , 1995 .

[6]  Fred R. Eckman.  A Functional-Typological Approach to Second Language Acquisition Theory , 1996 .

[7]  Sanford A. Schane.  PHONOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL MARKEDNESS , 1970 .

[8]  Keren Rice.  Featural markedness in phonology: variation , 2003 .

[9]  Jean E. Newman,et al.  Are stem changes as natural as affixes? , 1995 .

[10]  김상혁.  영어의 능격성(Ergativity) , 2003 .

[11]  Thomas A. Perry.  Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics , 1979 .

[12]  S. Potter,et al.  Universals of Language , 1966 .

[13]  J. Gair,et al.  Kinds of Markedness , 1988 .

[14]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal singulars and plurals in Italian , 1997 .

[15]  Henk C. van Riemsdijk,et al.  A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases , 1978 .

[16]  Fred R. Eckman.  Universals, innateness and explanation in second language acquisition , 2004 .

[17]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology , 1994 .

[18]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[19]  E. Faingold.  The Development of Grammar in Spanish and The Romance Languages , 2003 .

[20]  W. Bruce Croft.  Typology and Universals , 1990 .

[21]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Markedness — An Overview , 1986 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[23]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[24]  F. Newmeyer.  Iconicity and generative grammar , 1992 .

[25]  R. Major.  Markedness in Second Language Acquisition of Consonant Clusters , 1996 .

[26]  Gilbert Lazard,et al.  Transitivity and markedness: the antipassive in accusative languages , 1989 .

[27]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[28]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  Optimality and diachronic adaptation , 1999 .

[29]  R. Jakobson,et al.  Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums , 1971 .

[30]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: a usagebased account , 2004 .

[31]  Linda J. Schwartz,et al.  Syntactic Markedness and Frequency of Occurrence , 1980 .

[32]  Jane Grimshaw,et al.  Optimal Clitic Positions and the Lexicon in Romance Clitic Systems , 1998 .

[33]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Explaining Article-Possessor Complementarity: Economic Motivation in Noun Phrase Syntax. , 1999 .

[34]  M. Rita Manzini,et al.  Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory , 1987 .

[35]  Robert Dixon,et al.  The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia , 2004 .

[36]  Otmar Werner.  Sprachökonomie und Natürlichkeit im Bereich der Morphologie , 1989 .

[37]  Matthew S. Dryer.  Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order , 1995 .

[38]  John Haiman,et al.  Iconic and Economic Motivation , 1983 .

[39]  Thomas Givon,et al.  Markedness in Grammar: Distributional, Communicative and Cognitive Correlates of Syntactic Structure , 1991 .

[40]  Zygmunt Frajzyngier.  A grammar of Lele , 2001 .

[41]  J. Blevins.  The Syllable in Phonological Theory , 1995 .

[42]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies , 1966 .

[43]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English , 2004 .

[44]  Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon.  FREQUENZ UND KOGNITION — FREQUENZ UND MARKIERTHEIT , 1991 .

[45]  R. Jackendoff.  Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[46]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .

[47]  Simon Corston-Oliver.  Core arguments and the inversion of the nominal hierarchy in Roviana , 2003 .

[48]  A. Carnie.  Syntax: A Generative Introduction , 2002 .

[49]  WOLFGANG ULLRICH WURZEL,et al.  ON MARKEDNESS , 1998 .

[50]  The Polysynthesis Parameter. Mark C. Baker , 1997 .

[51]  Paul Valiant,et al.  The formal expression of markedness , 2002 .

[52]  Naomi Gurevich,et al.  A critique of markedness-based theories in phonology , 2001 .

[53]  Richard A. Geiger.  Reference in multidisciplinary perspective : philosophical object, cognitive subject, intersubjective process , 1995 .

[54]  M. Hale,et al.  Substance Abuse and Dysfunctionalism: Current Trends in Phonology , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[55]  Wolfgang Ullrich Wurzel,et al.  Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness , 1989 .