Determining Response-generating Contexts on Microblogging Platforms

In recent years the study of social media communities has come into the focus of research. One open but central question is which properties stimulate user interaction within communities and thus contribute to community building. In this paper, we provide a first step towards answering this question by identifying features in the Jodel microblogging app that trigger user responses as one form of attention. Jodel is a geographically restricted app that allows users to post threads and comments anonymously. The absence of displayed user information on Jodel makes the posted content the only trigger for user interaction, making the language the one and only means for users to gather contextual implications about their discourse partners. This enhanced function of language promises a revealing baseline investigation into linguistic behavior on social media. To approach this issue, we conducted a sequence of lexico-grammatical analyses and subjected the quantitative results to various statistical tests. While a Principal Component Analysis did not show a significant difference between the grammatical structure of original posts with and without answers, a negative binomial regression model focusing on the interpersonal meta-function yielded significant results. A further analysis of these features correlated to shorter or longer response times showed significant results for the interrogative mood. Additionally, keyword analyses revealed significant differences between posts with answers and without answers. Our study provides a promising first step towards understanding textual features triggering user interaction and thereby community building – an unresolved problem of practical relevance to social network operation.

[1]  Tony McEnery,et al.  Press and social media reaction to ideologically inspired murder: The case of Lee Rigby , 2015 .

[2]  Jurate Ruzaite,et al.  In search of hate speech in Lithuanian public discourse: A corpus-assisted analysis of online comments , 2018, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics.

[3]  Oliver Hohlfeld,et al.  Hashtag Usage in a Geographically-Local Microblogging App , 2019, WWW.

[4]  A. Kavada Creating the collective: social media, the Occupy Movement and its constitution as a collective actor , 2015, Protest Technologies and Media Revolutions.

[5]  Evelien D'heer,et al.  What social media data mean for audience studies: a multidimensional investigation of Twitter use during a current affairs TV programme , 2015 .

[6]  G. Enli Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election , 2017 .

[7]  Emiliano Treré,et al.  Reclaiming, proclaiming, and maintaining collective identity in the #YoSoy132 movement in Mexico: an examination of digital frontstage and backstage activism through social media and instant messaging platforms , 2015 .

[8]  Jacob Eisenstein,et al.  Identifying Regional Dialects in On‐Line Social Media , 2017 .

[9]  Mario Cataldi,et al.  Emerging topic detection on Twitter based on temporal and social terms evaluation , 2010, MDMKDD '10.

[10]  T. Poell Social media and the transformation of activist communication: exploring the social media ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests , 2014 .

[11]  Deen Freelon,et al.  Of big birds and bayonets: hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates , 2015 .

[12]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  A Measurement Study of Hate Speech in Social Media , 2017, HT.

[13]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[14]  Jannis Androutsopoulos,et al.  Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications , 2015 .

[15]  H. Laux,et al.  Der Fall Bautzen: Eine Netzwerkanalyse zur Entstehung digitaler Öffentlichkeiten , 2017 .

[16]  Peter Golding,et al.  Social media – New challenges and approaches for communications research , 2017 .

[17]  Stefan Evert,et al.  Twenty-first century Corpus Workbench: Updating a query architecture for the new millennium , 2011 .

[18]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Social Identification and Interpersonal Communication in Computer-Mediated Communication: What You Do versus Who You Are in Virtual Groups. , 2009 .

[19]  Gwen Bouvier,et al.  What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media: connecting with other academic fields? , 2015 .

[20]  I. Parker Facts and figures. , 1973, The Probe.

[21]  Fabienne Baider,et al.  “Go to hell fucking faggots, may you die!” framing the LGBT subject in online comments , 2018, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics.

[22]  Michele Zappavigna,et al.  Discourse of Twitter and social media , 2012 .

[23]  Brook Bolander,et al.  'Peter is a dumb nut’: Status Updates and Reactions to Them as ‘Acts of Positioning’ in Facebook , 2015 .

[24]  Megan French,et al.  Is Anybody Out There?: Understanding Masspersonal Communication Through Expectations for Response Across Social Media Platforms , 2017, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Brook Bolander,et al.  Humour in microblogging : exploiting linguistic humour strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups , 2015 .

[26]  Melanie Neunerdt,et al.  Part-of-Speech tagging and detection of social media texts , 2016 .

[27]  Melinda Dooly “I h8 txt msgs”. How Social Media Has Had an Impact on Language Awareness , 2017 .

[28]  Stella Neumann,et al.  Contrastive Register Variation: A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German , 2013, Modern Language Review.

[29]  Dirk Hovy,et al.  Capturing Regional Variation with Distributed Place Representations and Geographic Retrofitting , 2018, EMNLP.

[30]  Dirk Hovy,et al.  Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter , 2016, NAACL.

[31]  Thomas Proisl SoMeWeTa: A Part-of-Speech Tagger for German Social Media and Web Texts , 2018, LREC.

[32]  Stella Neumann,et al.  News in the context of regional and functional variation : a corpus-based analysis of newspaper domains across varieties of English , 2016 .

[33]  D. Chambers,et al.  Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship , 2013 .