Common malignant brain tumors: can 18F-FDG PET/CT aid in differentiation?

Objectives The objectives of this study were to evalute the metabolic characteristics of common malignant space-occupying lesions (SOL) of the brain and to determine the utility of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in differentiating between the common types of malignant brain SOL. Patients and methods All patients with brain SOL who were referred for an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan by a multidisciplinary team were included in this retrospective study. The metabolic characteristics of the brain lesions in the form of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) along with tumor-to-background activity ratios were determined and differences were compared using nonparametric statistical tests. Histopathological confirmation was used as the gold standard in all patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to find the optimal SUVmax cutoff to differentiate the tumor types. Results Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM; n=30), lymphoma (n=25), and metastases (n=46) accounted for most malignant tumors (95.2%). Lymphomas showed a significantly high metabolic uptake (median SUVmax=20.3, range: 8.1–46.3) compared with GBM ( median SUVmax=10.3, range: 2.6–21.7) and metastases (median SUVmax=11.5, range: 2.9–19.6) (P=0.00). The tumor-to-background activity ratios for lymphomas were also significantly higher. There was an overlap in the metabolic uptake of GBM and metastases, with no significant difference between their SUVmax values (P=0.245). A SUVmax more than 15.5 showed an 84% sensitivity and an 80% specificity to diagnose lymphomas (area under the curve=0.876, P=0.00). Four patients with brain lymphoma had extracranial disease on 18F-FDG PET. Lung cancer was the most common primary malignancy in patients with brain metastases. Conclusion Central nervous system lymphomas can be differentiated from GBM and metastases by their higher metabolic activity. In addition, 18F-FDG PET/CT can potentially impact therapeutic decisions by detecting primary malignancy in patients with metastatic brain lesions and extracranial disease sites in patients with brain lymphoma.

[1]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  PET scanning and the human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Chang-Guhn Kim,et al.  The Efficacy of Dual Time Point F-18 FDG PET Imaging for Grading of Brain Tumors , 2010, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[3]  D. Lee,et al.  Usefulness of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET in patients with suspected metastatic brain tumors. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  S. Minoshima,et al.  Differential Diagnosis of CNS Lesions in AIDS Patients by FDG‐PET , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  A. Alavi,et al.  Can the standardized uptake value characterize primary brain tumors on FDG-PET? , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  A. Espeland,et al.  Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Characteristic Findings on Traditional and Advanced Imaging , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  T. Hirai,et al.  Does adding FDG-PET to MRI improve the differentiation between primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma? Observer performance study , 2011, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[8]  Ingeborg Goethals,et al.  Validation of 18F-FDG PET at Conventional and Delayed Intervals for the Discrimination of High-Grade From Low-Grade Gliomas: A Stereotactic PET and MRI Study , 2013, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[9]  R. Coleman,et al.  FDG-PET in differentiating lymphoma from nonmalignant central nervous system lesions in patients with AIDS. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Daniel J Brat,et al.  Best cases from the AFIP: glioblastoma multiforme. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  R. Maciunas,et al.  Optimal cutoff levels of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the differentiation of low-grade from high-grade brain tumors with PET. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  18‐fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and survival of patients with suspected recurrent malignant glioma , 1997, Cancer.

[13]  L. Deangelis,et al.  The utility of body FDG PET in staging primary central nervous system lymphoma. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[14]  Thomas K Lewellen,et al.  18F-FDG PET of gliomas at delayed intervals: improved distinction between tumor and normal gray matter. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Differentiation of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme and Intracranial Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Using 11C-Methionine and 18F-FDG PET , 2012, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[16]  Harumi Itoh,et al.  18F-FDG PET of common enhancing malignant brain tumors. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Studies of primary central nervous system lymphoma with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Satoshi O. Suzuki,et al.  Differentiating primary CNS lymphoma from glioblastoma multiforme: assessment using arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography , 2013, Neuroradiology.

[19]  C. Calli,et al.  Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors. , 2006, European journal of radiology.