Magnetic resonance microscopy and correlative histopathology of the infarcted heart

[1]  A. Bayés‐Genís,et al.  Characterization and implications of the dynamics of eosinophils in blood and in the infarcted myocardium after coronary reperfusion , 2018, PloS one.

[2]  A. Evangelista,et al.  Prognostic Value of Strain by Tissue Tracking Cardiac Magnetic Resonance After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  T. Zhao,et al.  Ultra-high field upper extremity peripheral nerve and non-contrast enhanced vascular imaging , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  C. Bucciarelli-Ducci,et al.  Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease , 2017, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  J. Khan,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of outcomes in acute myocardial infarction , 2017, World journal of cardiology.

[6]  R. H. Stoffers,et al.  Assessment of myocardial injury after reperfused infarction by T1ρ cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[7]  J. Núñez,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Assessment of Remote Myocardial Fibrosis After Reperfused Myocardial Infarction in Swine and Patients , 2016, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[8]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Current T1 and T2 mapping techniques applied with simple thresholds cannot discriminate acute from chronic myocadial infarction on an individual patient basis: a pilot study , 2016, BMC Medical Imaging.

[9]  M. Robson,et al.  Adenosine Stress and Rest T1 Mapping Can Differentiate Between Ischemic, Infarcted, Remote, and Normal Myocardium Without the Need for Gadolinium Contrast Agents , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  J. Núñez,et al.  Inhomogeneity of collagen organization within the fibrotic scar after myocardial infarction: results in a swine model and in human samples , 2016, Journal of anatomy.

[11]  V. Fuster,et al.  Fast T2 gradient-spin-echo (T2-GraSE) mapping for myocardial edema quantification: first in vivo validation in a porcine model of ischemia/reperfusion , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[12]  N. Sattar,et al.  Pathophysiology of LV Remodeling in Survivors of STEMI , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  G A Krombach,et al.  T1, T2 Mapping and Extracellular Volume Fraction (ECV): Application, Value and Further Perspectives in Myocardial Inflammation and Cardiomyopathies , 2015, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[14]  Yushu Chen,et al.  Myocardial edema should be stratified according to the state of cardiomyocytes within the ischemic region. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Joshua H. Park,et al.  Numerical evaluation of image homogeneity, signal‐to‐noise ratio, and specific absorption rate for human brain imaging at 1.5, 3, 7, 10.5, and 14T in an 8‐channel transmit/receive array , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  V. Fuster,et al.  Myocardial edema after ischemia/reperfusion is not stable and follows a bimodal pattern: imaging and histological tissue characterization. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  S. Plein,et al.  Susceptibility-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in comparison to T2 and T2 star imaging for detection of intramyocardial hemorrhage following acute myocardial infarction at 3 Tesla , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  E. Marbán,et al.  In vivo contrast free chronic myocardial infarction characterization using diffusion-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[19]  D. Berman,et al.  Determination of Location, Size, and Transmurality of Chronic Myocardial Infarction Without Exogenous Contrast Media by Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Myocardial Tissue Characterization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[21]  S. K. White,et al.  Myocardial Tissue Characterization: Histological and Pathophysiological Correlation , 2014, Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports.

[22]  J. Pilla,et al.  In vivo chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[23]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Comparison of three multichannel transmit/receive radiofrequency coil configurations for anatomic and functional cardiac MRI at 7.0T: implications for clinical imaging , 2012, European Radiology.

[24]  M. Robson,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance by non contrast T1-mapping allows assessment of severity of injury in acute myocardial infarction , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[25]  G Allan Johnson,et al.  Modern Trends in Imaging VII: Magnetic Resonance Microscopy , 2011, Analytical cellular pathology.

[26]  Ana Gonzalez-Segura,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Microscopy at 14 Tesla and Correlative Histopathology of Human Brain Tumor Tissue , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Design and application of a four‐channel transmit/receive surface coil for functional cardiac imaging at 7T , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  J. Núñez,et al.  Prediction of Reverse Remodeling at Cardiac MR Imaging Soon after First ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results of a Large Prospective Registry. , 2016, Radiology.

[29]  G. Allan Johnson,et al.  Modern Trends in Imaging VII: Magnetic Resonance Microscopy , 2011, Analytical cellular pathology.