Three layers of openness in design: Examining the open paradigm in design research

This article examines the open paradigm in design research and introduces a new conceptualization for ‘open design’ and a three-layer framework to demonstrate the degrees of openness in design practices. The conceptualization comprises all stages in the design process, ranging from need-finding to the openness of the design documents and the data gathered during the design process, and the commercialization of the end-product. The aspects of the product and the process merge in this framework, intertwining the aspects of technical, legal and commercial openness. Finally, the article proposes a research agenda for open design. The article builds on an extensive literature review about studies on ‘open’ in design: open-source software, open hardware, and participatory methods in design, such as co-design and participatory design, and user-engagement methods such as crowdsourcing and co-creation.

[1]  Daniel Kreiss,et al.  The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society , 2011, New Media Soc..

[2]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[3]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Towards Open Design: The Emergent Face of Engineering---A Position Paper , 2009 .

[4]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[5]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[6]  David A. Wiley,et al.  Open Content and Open Educational Resources: Enabling universal education , 2008 .

[7]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  Hilde Bouchez,et al.  Pimp Your Home: Or Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive – From a Consumer Perspective , 2012 .

[9]  Sofiane Achiche,et al.  Open Design and Crowdsourcing: Maturity, Methodology and Business Models , 2012 .

[10]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[11]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[12]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[13]  Margit Osterloh,et al.  Open Source Software Development - Just Another Case of Collective Invention? , 2004 .

[14]  R. Kozinets On Netnography: Initial Reflections on Consumer Research Investigations of Cyberculture , 1998 .

[15]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[16]  Tanja Aitamurto,et al.  Balancing Between Open and Closed , 2013 .

[17]  Eduardo Corte-Real,et al.  Design Research in 2006 , 2006 .

[18]  Tiziana Terranova Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age , 2004 .

[19]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[20]  Pierre Lévy,et al.  Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace , 1997 .

[21]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Open knowledge management: Lessons from the open source revolution , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  B. Cova,et al.  Brand community of convenience products: new forms of customer empowerment – the case “my Nutella The Community” , 2006 .

[23]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  H. Chesbrough Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[25]  R. Vallance,et al.  OPEN DESIGN OF MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT , 2022 .

[26]  Andrew Keen,et al.  Book Review: Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. London and Boston, MA: Currency/Doubleday, 2007. 228 pp. ISBN 0—3855—2080—8, $22.95 (pbk) , 2008, New Media Soc..

[27]  Janet Hope,et al.  Open Source Biotechnology , 2004 .

[28]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[29]  N. Baym,et al.  Amateur experts , 2009 .

[30]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[31]  Jürgen Bitzer,et al.  Intrinsic motivation in open source software development , 2007 .

[32]  George Kuk,et al.  The Roles of Agency and Artifacts in Assembling Open Data Complementarities , 2011, ICIS.

[33]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition , 2008, PerMIS.

[34]  Tim Kappel,et al.  Ex Ante Crowdfunding and the Recording Industry: A Model for the U.S. , 2009 .

[35]  H. Chesbrough Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era , 2010 .

[36]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Sanne van der Beek,et al.  From Representation to Rhizome: Open Design from a Relational Perspective , 2012 .

[38]  Brian Giza The use of free, open-source, and web-based tools in education , 2009 .

[39]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[40]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  On the Open Design of Tangible Goods , 2009 .

[41]  F. Piller,et al.  Cracking the Code of Mass Customization , 2009 .

[42]  Oded Nov,et al.  Open source content contributors' response to free-riding: The effect of personality and context , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[44]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design , 2010, PDC '10.

[45]  Tanja Aitamurto,et al.  Open innovation in digital journalism: Examining the impact of Open APIs at four news organizations , 2013, New Media Soc..

[46]  David P. Myatt,et al.  Equilibrium Selection and Public‐good Provision: The Development of Open‐source Software , 2002 .

[47]  Charles M. Schweik,et al.  Brooks' versus Linus' law: an empirical test of open source projects , 2008, DG.O.