Do we really need Peirce’s whole decalogue of signs?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Butler. Early Modernism: Literature, Music, and Painting in Europe, 1900-1916 , 1994 .
[2] E. Conzé. Buddhist Thought in India , 1967 .
[3] E. Hutten. The origins of science : an inquiry into the foundations of Western thought , 1963 .
[4] Thomas A. Sebeok,et al. Contributions to the doctrine of signs , 1976 .
[5] W. B. Gallie. THE DEVELOPMENT OF PEIRCE'S PHILOSOPHY , 1962 .
[6] Degeneracy: A reading of Peirce's writing , 1990 .
[7] Paul Theerman,et al. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918 by Stephen Kern (review) , 1984 .
[8] R. E. Carter,et al. The Nothingness Beyond God: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Nishida Kitaro , 1989 .
[9] H. LEVY. An Experiment with Time , 1927, Nature.
[10] R. Rucker. Infinity and the Mind: The Science and Philosophy of the Infinite , 1982 .
[11] H A Dobbs,et al. The dimensions of the sensible present. , 1971, Studium generale; Zeitschrift fur die Einheit der Wissenschaften im Zusammenhang ihrer Begriffsbildungen und Forschungsmethoden.
[12] Gilles Deleuze,et al. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1972 .
[13] F. Merrell. Semiosis in the postmodern age , 1995 .
[14] Alfred North Whitehead,et al. Modes of Thought , 1939 .
[15] Linda Dalrymple Henderson,et al. The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art , 1983 .