Impact of health challenges on pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and net returns under commercial conditions

Abstract Understanding how disease affects commercial production is imperative for pig producers to quantify its full impact on pig performance, carcass quality, and net returns. The objective of this experiment was to assess the productivity and economic importance of naturally occurring health challenges (HC) under commercial conditions. Three 1,000 pig grow-finish facilities received 936 pigs each. The experimental period started approximately 34 d post placement at an average start BW of 13.1 ± 0.2 kg. Barns were characterized based on the relative HC, determined by diagnostic assessments as the main characterization tool, along with other health indicators. Barns were characterized as low challenge health (LCh), moderate challenge health (MCh), and high challenge health (HCh). All barns tested positive for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection prior to the start of the experiment. Additionally, the MCh and HCh barns experienced influenza type A virus of swine. Similar to commercial production conditions, the disease challenge was not imposed but rather occurred naturally. Reduced ADG, ADFI, and G:F were observed with an increased HC (P < 0.001). Similarly, mortality was increased when the HC increased (P < 0.001). Decreased ADG increased days to achieve harvest BW, by 10 and 15 d in the MCh and HCh treatments compared with LCh, respectively (P < 0.001). No differences were observed for percent lean, loin depth, or fat depth (P > 0.10). The economic impact of the HC was assessed by applying these growth performance data to two economic models encompassing the two main marketing methods used by U.S. pig producers: fixed-weight and fixed-time. Financial losses attributed to the variation in disease severity that occurred in the present study ranged from $8.49 and $26.10 U.S. dollars (USD)/pig marketed using a fixed-market weight model, or between $11.02 and $29.82 USD/pig using a fixed-time model, depending on feed costs and market hog prices. In conclusion, increasing severity of HC under commercial conditions reduced ADG by 8% and 14% and resulted in mortality as high as 19.9%. Losses of $8.49 to $29.82/pig marketed underscore the potential magnitude of the economic impact of mixed etiology concurrent diseases in pork production.

[1]  C. Nyachoti,et al.  Immune System Stimulation Increases Nursery Pig Maintenance Energy Requirements , 2017 .

[2]  C. Nyachoti,et al.  145 Immune system stimulation increases nursery pig maintenance energy requirements , 2017 .

[3]  K. Schwartz,et al.  The effect of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus challenge on growing pigs II: Intestinal integrity and function. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[4]  K. Schwartz,et al.  The effect of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus challenge on growing pigs I: Growth performance and digestibility1 , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[5]  G. Tonsor,et al.  Assessment of the economic impacts of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the United States , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[6]  R. Dilger,et al.  Effects of dietary soybean meal concentration on growth and immune response of pigs infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[7]  W. Schweer Impact of PRRS and PED viruses on grower pig performance and intestinal function , 2015 .

[8]  Rodney W. Johnson,et al.  Mannan oligosaccharide increases serum concentrations of antibodies and inflammatory mediators in weanling pigs experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus1,2 , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[9]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Journal of Swine Health and Production Blockin— Oral-fluid Blockinsamples Blockinfor Blockinsurveillance Blockinof Blockincommercial Blockingrowing Pigs Blockinfor Blockinporcine Blockinreproductive Blockinand Blockinrespiratory Blockinsyndrome Blockinvirus and Blockinporcine Blockincircovirus Block , 2022 .

[10]  James Kliebenstein,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork producers , 2013, Journal of Swine Health and Production.

[11]  Colin D. Johnson,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[12]  T. Stahly,et al.  Effect of level of chronic immune system activation on the growth and dietary lysine needs of pigs fed from 6 to 112 kg. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[13]  T. Stahly,et al.  Effect of chronic immune system activation on body nitrogen retention, partial efficiency of lysine utilization, and lysine needs of pigs. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[14]  T. Stahly,et al.  Effect of chronic immune system activation on the rate, efficiency, and composition of growth and lysine needs of pigs fed from 6 to 27 kg. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[15]  Hans Nauwynck,et al.  Dual infections of feeder pigs with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus followed by porcine respiratory coronavirus or swine influenza virus: a clinical and virological study , 1996, Veterinary Microbiology.