Evaluation of proposed amalgamated anonymization approach

In the current scenario of modern era, providing security to an individual is always a matter of concern when a huge volume of electronic data is gathering daily. Now providing security to the gathered data is not only a matter of concern but also remains a notable topic of research. The concept of Privacy Preserving Data Publishing (PPDP) defines accessing the published data without disclosing the non required information about an individual. Hence PPDP faces the problem of publishing useful data while keeping the privacy about sensitive information about an individual. A variety of techniques for anonymization has been found in literature, but suffers from different kind of problems in terms of data information loss, discernibility and average equivalence class size. This paper proposes amalgamated approach along with its verification with respect to information loss, value of discernibility and the value of average equivalence class size metric. The result have been found encouraging as compared to existing k- anonymity based algorithms such as Datafly, Mondrian and Incognito on various publically available datasets.

[1]  Syed,et al.  A FUZZY BASED APPROACH FOR PRIVACY PRESERVING CLUSTERING , 2014 .

[2]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Top-down specialization for information and privacy preservation , 2005, 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'05).

[3]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Anonymizing Classification Data for Privacy Preservation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Manish Sharma,et al.  An efficient approach for privacy preserving in data mining , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Signal Propagation and Computer Technology (ICSPCT 2014).

[5]  Sheetal Girase,et al.  Privacy Preservation of Data in Data Mining , 2014 .

[6]  Shuchita Upadhyaya,et al.  PERFORMANCE EXPLANATION OF K-ANONYMIZATION ALGORITHMS FOR AVERAGE CLASS PARTITIONING METRIC , 2018 .

[7]  R. Samsudin,et al.  Forecasting Drought Using Modified Empirical Wavelet Transform-ARIMA with Fuzzy C-Means Clustering , 2018, Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

[8]  Roberto J. Bayardo,et al.  Data privacy through optimal k-anonymization , 2005, 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'05).

[9]  Jasmin Ilyani Ahmad,et al.  Analysis Review on Public Key Cryptography Algorithms , 2018, Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

[10]  David J. DeWitt,et al.  Workload-aware anonymization , 2006, KDD '06.

[11]  David J. DeWitt,et al.  Incognito: efficient full-domain K-anonymity , 2005, SIGMOD '05.

[12]  Thomas Cerqueus,et al.  A Systematic Comparison and Evaluation of k-Anonymization Algorithms for Practitioners , 2014, Trans. Data Priv..

[13]  Suyash A. Patil,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Privacy Preserving Techniques in Distributed Database , 2015 .

[14]  Sri Hartati,et al.  Two Level Clustering for Quality Improvement using Fuzzy Subtractive Clustering and Self-Organizing Map , 2015 .

[15]  David J. DeWitt,et al.  Mondrian Multidimensional K-Anonymity , 2006, 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06).

[16]  Hidetomo Ichihashi,et al.  A fuzzy variant of k-member clustering for collaborative filtering with data anonymization , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[17]  Latanya Sweeney,et al.  Achieving k-Anonymity Privacy Protection Using Generalization and Suppression , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Chris Clifton,et al.  Thoughts on k-Anonymization , 2006, 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06).

[19]  Shuchita Upadhyaya,et al.  Performance Interpretation of k-Anonymization Algorithms for Discernibility Metric , 2017 .