ON THE FORCED VIBRATION TEST BY VIBRODYNE

Abstract. In civil engineering, Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) dynamic tests are powerful aids to the seismic design of new structures, and useful tools for the structural identification of existing structures. EMA tests require to accurately evaluate the harmonic forcing function that is applied to the structure under testing, in order to correctly apply “model updating” procedures. The present work experimentally investigates on the nature of the forcing function applied by a vibrodyne, and its influence on the results of simulations on the dynamics of a single degree of freedom system . By using wireless accelerometers attached to a vibrodyne, we were able to measure the applied accelerations in the time domain, and the applied forcing function under different frequencies. Such an identification procedure was applied both in presence of 3+3 keyed masses, and in presence of 5+5 keyed masses, considering different angular speeds. In both cases, the forcing function applied by the vibrodyne was accurately determined as a function of time. We found out that the actual forcing function is slightly different from the theoretical sinusoidal profile, featuring marked oscillations.The work is completed by the analysis of the dynamic response a simple degree of freedom system under the action of smooth and oscillating sinusoidal forcing functions. A comparison between the results of the analyzed systems highlights marked mismatches in terms of predicted displacements, velocities, and accelerations. We therefore conclude that an accurate knowledge of the applied forcing function in EMA tests is essential in order to correctly identify the properties of the tested structures.

[1]  Claude Boutin,et al.  In situ experiments and seismic analysis of existing buildings. Part II: Seismic integrity threshold , 2005 .

[2]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[3]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Automated Operational Modal Analysis as Structural Health Monitoring Tool: Theoretical and Applicative Aspects , 2007 .

[4]  Fernando Fraternali,et al.  Universal formulae for the limiting elastic energy of membrane networks , 2011, 1102.1383.

[5]  Fernando Fraternali,et al.  Solitary waves on tensegrity lattices , 2012 .

[6]  Fernando Fraternali,et al.  Multiscale tunability of solitary wave dynamics in tensegrity metamaterials , 2014, 1409.7097.

[7]  M. Durand,et al.  Stiffest elastic networks , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  F. Fraternali.  Free discontinuity finite element models in two-dimensions for in-plane crack problems , 2007 .

[9]  E. Ercan,et al.  Identification of Historical Veziragasi Aqueduct Using the Operational Modal Analysis , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[10]  F. Fraternali,et al.  On the use of mechanical metamaterials for innovative seismic isolation systems , 2015 .

[11]  Fernando Fraternali,et al.  On the estimation of the curvatures and bending rigidity of membrane networks via a local maximum-entropy approach , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[12]  Claude Boutin,et al.  In situ experiments and seismic analysis of existing buildings. Part I: experimental investigations , 2005 .

[13]  Mario Paz,et al.  Structural Dynamics: Theory and Computation , 1981 .