The Syntax of Aspect in Thai

Abstract.This paper describes the syntax and semantics of the aspect system of Thai. Its interaction between linear order and scope has not been described in detail in the previous literature and its complexity makes it particularly relevant to discussions of the similarity of syntactic and semantic structures. It is argued that Thai presents challenges to some hypotheses about the interface between the syntax and semantics of semantic modifiers, in particular, Cinque’s (1999) hypothesis that the semantic structures of modifiers are isomorphic to the syntactic structures that express them, as well as Kayne’s (1994) Linear Correspondence Axiom. The syntax of aspect in Thai suggests that syntactic and semantic structures are independent levels of representation that are not mapped uniformly onto each other and that a functional category’s lexical entry must record both its part of speech and its combinatorial potential.

[1]  Walt Detmar Meurers,et al.  Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar , 2006 .

[2]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[3]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives , 2001 .

[4]  Sara Thomas Rosen,et al.  Argument structure and complex predicates , 1990 .

[5]  Jean-Yves Pollock Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[6]  Carlota S. Smith,et al.  The Parameter of Aspect , 1991 .

[7]  Nuttanart Muansuwan,et al.  Verb complexes in Thai , 2002 .

[8]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  The status of "mobile" suffixes , 2001 .

[9]  G. Cinque The interaction of Passive, Causative, and "Restructuring" in Romance , 1998 .

[10]  Emmon Bach,et al.  Categorial Grammars as Theories of Language , 1988 .

[11]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Aspect shift and coercion , 1998 .

[12]  Jason Baldridge,et al.  Lexically specified derivational control in combinatory categorial grammar , 2002 .

[13]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[14]  Dan Flickinger,et al.  Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction , 2005 .

[15]  G. Cinque Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 1999 .

[16]  D. Flickinger Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon , 1989 .

[17]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  How to End Without Ever Finishing: Thai Semi-perfectivity , 2000, J. Semant..

[18]  Rint Sybesma,et al.  The Mandarin VP , 1998 .

[19]  Mary R. Haas,et al.  THAI-ENGLISH, STUDENT'S DICTIONARY. , 1964 .

[20]  Anne Abeillé,et al.  Two Kinds of Composition in French Complex Predicates , 1997 .

[21]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  An Algebra for Semantic Construction in Constraint-based Grammars , 2001, ACL.

[22]  Prapa. Sookgasem Morphology, syntax and semantics of auxiliaries in Thai. , 1990 .

[23]  Ewan Klein,et al.  A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives , 1980 .

[24]  Höskuldur Thráinsson On the (Non-) Universality of Functional Categories , 1996 .

[25]  Pauline Jacobson,et al.  Raising as function composition , 1990 .

[26]  Jerrold M. Sadock Parts of Speech in Autolexical Syntax , 1990 .

[27]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax , 1997 .

[28]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[29]  Judith Aissen The syntax of causative constructions , 1979 .

[30]  Mark Steedman,et al.  The syntactic process , 2004, Language, speech, and communication.

[31]  Ray Jackendoff TWISTIN' THE NIGHT AWAY , 1997 .

[32]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference , 1988, CL.

[33]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .