Comparison of Over-the-Rail and Rail Yard Measurements of Diesel Locomotives.

Locomotive prime mover engine emission rates are typically measured at steady-state for discrete throttle notches using an engine dynamometer weighted by a standard duty cycle. However, this method may not represent real-world locomotive emissions. A method for in-use measurement of passenger locomotives, using a portable emissions measurement system (PEMS), was developed to estimate duty cycle average emission rates. We conducted 48 measurements of one-way trips between Raleigh and Charlotte, NC, on 7 locomotives and 18 sets of measurements in the rail yard (RY). Real-world duty cycles differed from those used for regulatory analyses, leading to statistically significant lower cycle average NOx and HC emission rates. Compared to RY measurements, notch average NOx emission rates measured over-the-rail (OTR) at the highest two notch settings were, on average, 19% lower for four locomotives. At the highest notch, OTR CO2 emission rates were, on average, 12% lower than RY rates for five locomotives. For a more accurate representation of real-world emission rates, OTR measurements are preferred. However, using steady-state notch average RY emission rates and standard duty cycles may be tolerable for some applications. OTR versus RY cycle average emission rates typically differed by less than 10%.

[1]  Daniel A. Burgard,et al.  Spectroscopy Applied to On-Road Mobile Source Emissions , 2006, Applied spectroscopy.

[2]  M. Vojtíšek-Lom,et al.  Development Of Heavy-Duty Diesel Portable, On-Board Mass Exhaust Emissions Monitoring System With NOx, CO2 And Qualitative PM Capabilities , 2001 .

[3]  Janet Yanowitz Particulate Matter Emissions during Transient Locomotive Operation: Preliminary Study , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  Javed A. Chattha,et al.  Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Levels of Diesel Engines of Switch Locomotives , 2006 .

[5]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  Evaluation of Emissions and Performance of Diesel Locomotives With B20 Biodiesel Blends: Static Test Results , 2008 .

[6]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Portable Emission Measurement System for Emissions of Passenger Rail Locomotives , 2012 .

[7]  S. Bohac,et al.  Exhaust Emissions Characterization of a Turbocharged 2-Stroke Tier 0+ Locomotive Engine: NOx, Particulate Matter and Soluble Organic Fraction Composition , 2012 .

[8]  A. H. Bryant,et al.  EXHAUST EMISSIONS OF SELECTED RAILROAD DIESEL LOCOMOTIVES , 1975 .

[9]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  On-Road Measurement of Vehicle Tailpipe Emissions Using a Portable Instrument , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  R. Harley,et al.  Scaling of Infrared Remote Sensor Hydrocarbon Measurements for Motor Vehicle Emission Inventory Calculations , 1998 .

[11]  Steven G. Fritz,et al.  Locomotive Idle and Start-Up Exhaust Emissions Testing , 2008 .

[12]  Robert Dunn,et al.  Influence of Duty Cycles and Fleet Profile on Emissions From Locomotives in Canada , 2002 .

[13]  Steven H Cadle,et al.  Analysis of Remote Sensing Errors of Omission and Commission Under FTP Conditions. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  S. G. Fritz Evaluation of Biodiesel Fuel in an EMD GP38-2 Locomotive , 2004 .

[15]  S. G. Fritz,et al.  The Effect Of Injection Timing, Enhanced Aftercooling, And Low Sulfur-low Aromatic Diesel Fuel On Locomotive Exhaust Emissions , 1992 .

[16]  Mary C. Holcomb,et al.  Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 7 , 1984 .

[17]  M. Vojtíšek-Lom,et al.  Vehicle mass emissions measurements using a portable 5-gas exhaust analyzer and engine computer data , 2009 .

[18]  S. G. Fritz,et al.  The Effects of Biodiesel Fuel Blends on Exhaust Emissions From a General Electric Tier 2 Line-Haul Locomotive , 2010 .

[19]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 31 , 2012 .

[20]  K. T. Knapp,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Remote Sensing-Based Hydrocarbon Measurements: A Comparison to FID Measurements. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[21]  Stanislav V. Bohac,et al.  Effect of Injection Timing on Combustion, NOx, Particulate Matter and Soluble Organic Fraction Composition in a 2-Stroke Tier 0+ Locomotive Engine , 2013 .

[22]  Steven G. Fritz,et al.  Exhaust Emissions From a 2,850 kW EMD SD60M Locomotive Equipped With a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst , 2007 .

[23]  S. K. Punwani,et al.  Onboard Locomotive Exhaust Emissions Measurement , 2007 .

[24]  S. G. Fritz Exhaust emissions from two intercity passenger locomotives , 1994 .

[25]  H. Frey,et al.  Effects of Errors on Vehicle Emission Rates from Portable Emissions Measurement Systems , 2013 .

[26]  Julia Frankfurter,et al.  Air Pollution Control A Design Approach , 2016 .

[27]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comparison of Locomotive Emissions Measured during Dynamometer versus Rail Yard Engine Load Tests , 2013 .

[28]  Thermo Andersen Environmental Technology Verification Report , 2001 .

[29]  S. G. Fritz,et al.  Gaseous and Particulate Emissions From Diesel Locomotive Engines , 1991 .