Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations

This report reviews the construct of expectancy and its relevance to understanding communication phenomena. Given the shortage of empirically based knowledge about what constitute expected and unexpected interpersonal behaviors and how they are evaluated, a two-part experiment was conducted to determine the expectedness and evaluation of three nonverbal variables: touch, conversational distance, and posture. The possible moderating effects of communicator attractiveness, status, and gender were also examined. Respondents (N = 622) viewed photographs of an attractive or unattractive male or female stimulus interacting with a male or female partner, attributed to be of same, higher, or lower status, who displayed one of seven forms of touch or one of nine combinations of posture and proximity. Respondents rated the appropriateness, typicality, and desirability of the observed behavior. Results demonstrated that several behaviors are expected and positively valenced, while others qualify as positive or negative violations of expectations. Attractiveness influenced expectancies and evaluations; gender and status had limited effects. Implications for information processing and nonverbal expectancy violations theory are discussed.

[1]  John O. Greene,et al.  A discrepancy‐arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant‐adult interaction 1 , 1982 .

[2]  R. Heslin,et al.  Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. , 1976, Sociometry.

[3]  S. Planalp.  Relational schemata: A test of alternative forms of relational knowledge as guides to communication. , 1985 .

[4]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[5]  M. Joseph Sirgy,et al.  A social cognition model of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction an experiment , 1984 .

[6]  Julia T. Wood.  Communication and relational culture: Bases for the study of human relationships , 1982 .

[7]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PERSONAL SPACE EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR VIOLATIONS , 1976 .

[8]  Allan Mazur,et al.  Incipient Status in Small Groups , 1979 .

[9]  M. Patterson,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior: A Functional Perspective. , 1984 .

[10]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Gender Differences in Touch: An Empirical and Theoretical Review , 1984 .

[11]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives , 1991 .

[12]  R. Street,et al.  Speech Evaluation Differences as a Function of Perspective (Participant Versus Observer) and Presentational Medium , 1988 .

[13]  Dennis P. Nelson,et al.  A Comparison of the Effects of Sex and Status on the Perceived Appropriateness of Nonverbal Behaviors , 1982 .

[14]  Robert W. Suchner,et al.  Power implications of touch in male—Female relationships , 1978 .

[15]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  Visual Behavior in Social Interaction , 1972 .

[16]  E. Tolman.  Purposive behavior in animals and men , 1932 .

[17]  Thomas J. Housel,et al.  Schema Theory: Can It Connect Communication's Discourse?. , 1979 .

[18]  R. Sabatelli,et al.  Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions , 1986 .

[19]  R. Harper.  Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior: An Overview , 1985 .

[20]  D. Stacks,et al.  A communicative model of violations of distancing expectations , 1979 .

[21]  D. Rumelhart.  Schemata and the cognitive system. , 1984 .

[22]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors , 1988 .

[23]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and personal space: Research review and theoretical model , 1976 .

[24]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction. , 1987 .

[25]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance , 1985 .

[26]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and Extension , 1986 .

[27]  Howard M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Intimacy-mediators of the proximity-gaze compensation effect: Movement, conversational role, acquaintance, and gender , 1984 .

[28]  Kathy Kellermann.  The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction , 1984 .

[29]  J. Conaty,et al.  The Effects of Status Differentiation on Nonverbal Behavior , 1982 .

[30]  C. L. Hull,et al.  A Behavior System , 1954 .

[31]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[32]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[33]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[34]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviors. , 1984 .

[35]  J. Cappella.  Mutual influence in expressive behavior: adult--adult and infant--adult dyadic interaction. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  G. Staines.  Six – Men and Women in Role Relationships , 1986 .

[37]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[38]  N. Henley,et al.  Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication , 1977 .

[39]  Valerie Manusov,et al.  Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretation , 1985 .

[40]  A. Mehrabian.  Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. , 1968, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[41]  Attribution of personal characteristics as a function of the degree of touch on initial contact and sex , 1976 .

[42]  R. Mcfarland,et al.  The effects of oxygen deprivation on eye movements in reading , 1937 .

[43]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Communicative effects of gaze behavior: a test of two contrasting explanations , 1986 .

[44]  R. Hinde.  Towards understanding relationships , 1979 .

[45]  N. Henley,et al.  The Nonverbal Semantics of Power and Gender: A Perceptual Study , 1985 .

[46]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Personal Space: An Analysis of E.T. Hall’s Proxemics Framework , 1977 .

[47]  Kathy Kellermann,et al.  Anticipation of Future Interaction and Information Exchange in Initial Interaction , 1986 .

[48]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  A semantic space for nonverbal behavior. , 1970 .

[49]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The Self and social life , 1987 .

[50]  Donna E. Thompson,et al.  Interpersonal distance preferences , 1979 .

[51]  G. Weisfeld,et al.  Dominance Displays as Indicators of a Social Success Motive , 1985 .

[52]  Jay Hewitt,et al.  Initial interaction distance among individuals equal and unequal in military rank. , 1975 .

[53]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Three field experiments on the effects of violations of conversational distance , 1982 .

[54]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal expectancy violations and conversational involvement , 1988 .

[55]  R. Baron.  Invasions of personal space and helping: Mediating effects of invader's apparent need ☆ , 1978 .

[56]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[57]  R. Sommer,et al.  Seating arrangements and status. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  E. Tolman.  There is more than one kind of learning. , 1949, Psychological review.

[59]  J. Burgoon.  A Communication Model of Personal Space Violations: Explication and an Initial Test. , 1978 .

[60]  Stanley E. Jones,et al.  A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch , 1985 .

[61]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[62]  E. Goffman.  Encounters; Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction , 1962 .

[63]  André Lafrance.  Les pouvoirs individuels dans les communications organisationnelles , 1990 .

[64]  D. Dunkerley.  The Measurement of Social Norms , 1970 .

[65]  N. Henley.  Status and sex: Some touching observations , 1973 .

[66]  Dean E. Hewes,et al.  There is nothing as useful as a good theory: The influence of social knowledge on interpersonal communication , 1982 .

[67]  M. Robin DiMatteo,et al.  Toward understanding relationships: byRobert A. Hinde, Academic, London, 1979. 367 pp. $18.00 , 1981 .

[68]  J. Darley,et al.  Constructing other persons: A limit on the effect , 1985 .

[69]  J. Jackson,et al.  A Conceptual and Measurement Model for Norms and Roles , 1966 .

[70]  B MacWhinney,et al.  The role of arousal in memory for conversation , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[71]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Implicit Psychology: An Introduction to Social Cognition , 1977 .