Objective and Subjective Rationality in a Multiple Prior Model

A decision maker is characterized by two binary relations. The first reflects decisions that are rational in an “objective” sense: the decision maker can convince others that she is right in making them. The second relation models decisions that are rational in a “subjective” sense: the decision maker cannot be convinced that she is wrong in making them. We impose axioms on these relations that allow a joint representation by a single set of prior probabilities. It is “objectively rational” to choose f in the presence of g if and only if the expected utility of f is at least as high as that of g given each and every prior in the set. It is “subjectively rational” to choose f rather than g if and only if the minimal expected utility of f (relative to all priors in the set) is at least as high as that of g.

[1]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[2]  J. Keynes A Treatise on Probability. , 1923 .

[3]  B. D. Finetti La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives , 1937 .

[4]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[5]  J. Milnor,et al.  AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO MEASURABLE UTILITY , 1953 .

[6]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  A comparison of game theory and learning theory , 1956 .

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[9]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[10]  R. Aumann UTILITY THEORY WITHOUT THE COMPLETENESS AXIOM , 1962 .

[11]  Yakar Kannai,et al.  Existence of a utility in infinite dimensional partially ordered spaces , 1963 .

[12]  F. J. Anscombe,et al.  A Definition of Subjective Probability , 1963 .

[13]  B. Peleg UTILITY FUNCTIONS FOR PARTIALLY ORDERED TOPOLOGICAL SPACES. , 1970 .

[14]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[15]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[18]  박상용 [경제학] 현시선호이론(Revealed Preference Theory) , 1980 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[20]  K. Arrow Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System , 1986 .

[21]  P. Kline Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[22]  D. Schmeidler Integral representation without additivity , 1986 .

[23]  D. Schmeidler Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity , 1989 .

[24]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[25]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  Herd Behavior and Investment , 1990 .

[26]  P. Malliavin Infinite dimensional analysis , 1993 .

[27]  Kim C. Border,et al.  Infinite dimensional analysis , 1994 .

[28]  M. Schervish,et al.  A Representation of Partially Ordered Preferences , 1995 .

[29]  Donato Michele Cifarelli,et al.  De Finetti''''s contributions to probability and statistics , 1996 .

[30]  Lars Stole,et al.  Impetuous Youngsters and Jaded Old-Timers: Acquiring a Reputation for Learning , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Philippe Mongin,et al.  Expected Utility Theory , 1998 .

[32]  Itzhak Gilboa,et al.  A theory of case-based decisions , 2001 .

[33]  Klaus Nehring Ambiguity in the Context of Probabilistic Beliefs , 2001 .

[34]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  A Subjective Spin on Roulette Wheels , 2001 .

[35]  T. Bewley Knightian decision theory. Part I , 2002 .

[36]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Ambiguity from the Differential Viewpoint , 2002 .

[37]  Efe A. Ok Utility Representation of an Incomplete Preference Relation , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[38]  Robert Nau The Shape of Incomplete Preferences , 2003, ISIPTA.

[39]  M. Marinacci,et al.  A Smooth Model of Decision Making Under Ambiguity , 2003 .

[40]  Gilat Levy,et al.  Anti-herding and strategic consultation , 2004 .

[41]  Itzhak Gilboa,et al.  Rationality of Belief , 2004 .

[42]  Fabio Maccheroni,et al.  Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[43]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[44]  Silvano Holzer,et al.  Representation of subjective preferences under ambiguity , 2005 .

[45]  Michael Mandler,et al.  Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[46]  Eric Danan,et al.  Are preferences complete? An experimental measurement of indecisiveness under risk , 2006 .

[47]  Klaus Nehring,et al.  Decision-Making in the Context of Imprecise Probabilistic Beliefs , 2006 .

[48]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[49]  Paul Weirich,et al.  Collective, universal, and joint rationality , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..

[50]  T. V. Zandt,et al.  Expected Utility Theory , 2007, The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice.

[51]  Thibault Gajdos,et al.  Attitude toward imprecise information , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[52]  Eric Danan,et al.  Revealed preference and indifferent selection , 2008, Math. Soc. Sci..

[53]  Igor Kopylov,et al.  Choice deferral and ambiguity aversion , 2009 .

[54]  Kyoungwon Seo,et al.  AMBIGUITY AND SECOND-ORDER BELIEF , 2009 .

[55]  Klaus Nehring,et al.  Imprecise probabilistic beliefs as a context for decision-making under ambiguity , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[56]  Ariel Rubinstein Similarity and Decision Making Under Risk , 2010 .