Modelling the Performance of Signalized Intersections Near Railway Crossings

Railway related pre-emption time, which refers to the time needed to clear a vehicle from the pathway of a train, isa necessary input for appropriate pre-emption traffic signal settings. It is, however, usually left to the judgment of the signal engineer, using assumptions not always based on hard evidence. The research reported here analysed the safety and performance at railway crossings in the vicinity of signalized intersections with the aid of micro traffic simulation modelling. The developed model was calibrated by comparing the time that the last vehicle on the railway tracks to be cleared. A location in Brisbane, Australia, was chosen to apply the proposed methodology. The case study was used to evaluate three settings, which were implemented using fixed signal time; pre-emption with actuated signal; and actuated signal only. The signal logic was developed with the aid of an external signal controller to replicate pre-emption technology. The resultsfrom the simulation model show that the use of the pre-emption benefits safety and driving performance by changing signals dynamically in accordance withconditions related to traffic flow, train frequency and the proportion of heavy goods vehicles.

[1]  Michelle Yeh,et al.  Traffic Control Devices and Barrier Systems at Grade Crossings: Literature Review , 2007 .

[2]  Gary Long Easy-to-Apply Solution to a Persistent Safety Problem: Clearance Time for Railroad-Preempted Traffic Signals , 2003 .

[3]  W F Bremer,et al.  IMPROVING GRADE CROSSING SAFETY NEAR HIGHWAY INTERSECTIONS , 1997 .

[4]  Peter Hidas A functional evaluation of the AIMSUN, PARAMICS and VISSIM microsimulation models , 2005 .

[5]  S. Khasnabis,et al.  Signal preemption as a priority treatment tool for transit demand management , 1991, Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991.

[6]  H W Korve Traffic signal operations near highway-rail grade crossings , 1999 .

[7]  Laurence R. Rilett,et al.  Modeling Signalized Intersections near Highway–Railroad Grade Crossings: Sensitivity Analyses of Key Design Parameters , 2006 .

[8]  A. Hegyi,et al.  Optimal Coordination of Variable Speed Limits to Suppress Shock Waves , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Decision Tree Model to Prioritize Signalized Intersections near Highway–Railroad Crossings for Railroad Interconnect , 2010 .

[10]  Zong Tian,et al.  Queue Length Models for All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections , 2006 .

[11]  John A. Volpe,et al.  Driver Behavior at Highway- Railroad Grade Crossings: A Literature Review from 1990-2006 , 2008 .

[12]  Peter S Marshall,et al.  DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR RAILROAD PREEMPTION AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 1997 .

[13]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  Evaluating Safety at Railway Level Crossings with Microsimulation Modeling , 2012 .

[14]  Zong Tian,et al.  Simulation-Based Study of Traffic Operational Characteristics at All-Way-Stop-Controlled Intersections , 2001 .

[15]  Mecit Cetin,et al.  Analytical Evaluation of the Error in Queue Length Estimation at Traffic Signals From Probe Vehicle Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Jonathan Michael Tydlacka A microsimulation analysis of highway intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings , 2004 .

[17]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  Advance Preempt with Gate-Down Confirmation , 2007 .