Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame

Repetitive experience with the same visual stimulus and task can remarkably improve behavioral performance on the task. This well-known perceptual-learning phenomenon is usually specific to the trained retinal- or visual-field location, which is taken as an indication of plastic changes in retinotopic visual areas. In previous studies of perceptual learning, however, a change in stimulus location on the retina is accompanied by positional changes of the stimulus in nonretinotopic frames of reference, such as relative to the head and other objects. It is unclear, therefore, whether the putative location specificity is exclusively retinotopic or if it could also depend on nonretinotopic representation of the stimulus, which is particularly important for multisensory and sensorimotor integration as well as for maintenance of stable visual percepts. Here, by manipulating subjects’ gaze direction to control spatial and retinal locations of stimuli independently, we found that, when the stimulated retinal regions were held constant, the improvement with training in motion-direction discrimination of two successively displayed stimuli was restricted to the relative spatial position of the stimuli but independent of their absolute locations in head- and world-centered frame. These findings indicate location specificity of perceptual learning beyond retinotopic frame of reference, suggesting a pliable spatiotopic mechanism that can be specifically shaped by experience for better spatiotemporal integration of the learned stimuli.

[1]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Carl R Olson,et al.  Brain representation of object-centered space in monkeys and humans. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  H L Pick,et al.  Gaze-contingent adaptation to prismatic spectacles. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4 , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  John M. Allman,et al.  The Effect of Gaze Angle and Fixation Distance on the Responses of Neurons in V1, V2, and V4 , 2002, Neuron.

[6]  E. Zohary,et al.  The coordinate frame of pop-out learning , 2008, Vision Research.

[7]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision , 1989, Nature.

[9]  Scott O Murray,et al.  The effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex are stimulus independent. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[10]  R. Andersen Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Transsaccadic memory of position and form. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[17]  Ning Qian,et al.  Learning motion discrimination with suppressed MT , 2004, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Mayhew After-effects of movement contingent on direction of gaze. , 1973, Vision Research.

[19]  David Melcher,et al.  Dynamic, object-based remapping of visual features in trans-saccadic perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[20]  David Melcher,et al.  Spatiotopic temporal integration of visual motion across saccadic eye movements , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[22]  S Zeki,et al.  Localization and globalization in conscious vision. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Bruno B Averbeck,et al.  Representing spatial relationships in posterior parietal cortex: single neurons code object-referenced position. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Eye position effects in monkey cortex. I. Visual and pursuit-related activity in extrastriate areas MT and MST. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  C. Colby,et al.  Trans-saccadic perception , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Gaze modulation of visual aftereffects , 2010 .

[27]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[28]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[30]  F. Bremmer,et al.  Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons , 1997, Nature.

[31]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Frank Bremmer,et al.  Navigation in space – the role of the macaque ventral intraparietal area , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  B. Butler,et al.  Spatiotopic and retinotopic components of iconic memory , 1987, Psychological research.

[34]  D. Melcher Spatiotopic Transfer of Visual-Form Adaptation across Saccadic Eye Movements , 2005, Current Biology.

[35]  C. Genovese,et al.  Remapping in human visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. , 1985, Science.

[37]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  Unsupervised Natural Experience Rapidly Alters Invariant Object Representation in Visual Cortex , 2008, Science.

[38]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. , 1992, Science.

[40]  S. Celebrini,et al.  Gaze direction controls response gain in primary visual-cortex neurons , 1999, Nature.

[41]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning of spatial localization: specificity for orientation, position, and context. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  I KOHLER,et al.  Experiments with goggles. , 1962, Scientific American.

[43]  Bruno B Averbeck,et al.  Neural Ensemble Decoding Reveals a Correlate of Viewer- to Object-Centered Spatial Transformation in Monkey Parietal Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  L. Abbott,et al.  Invariant visual responses from attentional gain fields. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Beyond retinotopic mapping: the spatial representation of objects in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  J. Bisley,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for spatiotopic processing in area MT in a short-term memory for motion task. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[48]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to Link Visual Contours , 2008, Neuron.

[49]  D. Melcher Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  The Native Coordinate System of Spatial Attention Is Retinotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning and adult cortical plasticity , 2009, The Journal of physiology.