Mixed-Initiative Argumentation: A Framework for Justification Management in Clinical Group Decision Support

This paper identifies ways in which traditional approaches to argumentation can be modified to meet the needs of practical group decision support. A framework for outcome-driven decision rationale management is proposed that permits a novel conception of mixed-initiative argumentation. The framework is evaluated in the context of group decision support in medicine.

[1]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Argumentation for Decision Support , 2006, DEXA.

[2]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  On the accrual of arguments in defeasible logic programming , 2009, IJCAI 2009.

[3]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Revision of an Argumentation System , 2008, KR.

[4]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Explaining preferences with argument positions , 2005, IJCAI.

[5]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks , 2002, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[6]  Dimitris Papadias,et al.  Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system , 2001, Inf. Syst..

[7]  Leon van der Torre,et al.  Acyclic Argumentation: Attack = Conflict + Preference , 2006, ECAI.

[8]  Henri Prade,et al.  Using arguments for making and explaining decisions , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments in Preference-based Argumentation , 1998, UAI.

[10]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon.  Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[11]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy , 2005, AI & SOCIETY.

[12]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Logics for Defeasible Argumentation , 2001 .

[13]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Integrating Preference Orderings into Argument-Based Reasoning , 1997, ECSQARU-FAPR.

[14]  Curry Guinn,et al.  Mixed-initiative interaction , 1999 .

[15]  Pavlos Moraitis,et al.  Making Decisions through Preference-Based Argumentation , 2008, KR.

[16]  Leila Amgoud.  Using Preferences to Select Acceptable Arguments , 1998, ECAI.

[17]  Henri Prade,et al.  Explaining Qualitative Decision under Uncertainty by Argumentation , 2006, AAAI.

[18]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Accrual of arguments in defeasible argumentation , 1999 .

[19]  Sylvie Doutre,et al.  Preferred Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks: Query Answering and Computation , 2001, IJCAR.

[20]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Computer Decision-Support Systems for Public Argumentation: Criteria for Assessment , 2001 .

[21]  Srdjan Vesic,et al.  On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems , 2009, ECSQARU.

[22]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Defeasible Reasoning , 2020, Synthese Library.

[23]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning , 1996, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.

[24]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Agent Dialogues with Conflicting Preferences , 2001, ATAL.

[25]  Aditya K. Ghose,et al.  Mixed-Initiative Argumentation: Group Decision Support in Medicine , 2009, eHealth.

[26]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  An Argumentation-Theoretic Foundations for Logic Programming , 1995, J. Log. Program..

[27]  Henry Prakken,et al.  A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning , 2005, ICAIL '05.

[28]  Sanjay Modgil,et al.  Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[29]  John Fox,et al.  Argumentation-Based Inference and Decision Making--A Medical Perspective , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.