Improving an Existing Product Family Based on Commonality/Diversity, Modularity, and Cost

As product life cycles become shorter and shorter, stakes are higher in terms of sales and profits, making it an imperative for companies to enhance existing product families as much as possible. Redesigning a family of products can become a difficult task when considering the number of variables (products, modules, components, etc.), competing objectives (diversity-commonality, cost-variety, etc.), and actual technical solutions (cost value, architectural constraints), etc. In this paper, a methodology using the Design Structure Matrix flow (DSMflow ), Value Analysis (VA), and the Commonality versus Diversity Index (CDI) is proposed to improve an existing family of products. These three tools enable the assessment and the improvement of (1) commonality and diversity within the family, (2) feature satisfaction through design, and (3) definition of new modules/components and their interfaces. A case study based on a family of refrigerators (including CAD models) is detailed in this paper to demonstrate the methodology. The proposed methodology supports both the reengineering of an existing family and can also be extended to benefit the early development stages when designing a new family of products.Copyright © 2006 by ASME

[1]  Kevin Otto,et al.  An empirical foundation for product flexibility , 2005 .

[2]  赤尾 洋二,et al.  QFD : the customer-driven approach to quality planning and deployment , 1994 .

[3]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Nippondenso Co. Ltd: A case study of strategic product design , 1993 .

[4]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[5]  David A. Collier,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT AND OPERATING BENEFITS OF COMPONENT PART COMMONALITY , 1981 .

[6]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[7]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Measuring Shape Commonality , 2006 .

[9]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[10]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: Definitions and benefits , 2003 .

[11]  Henri J. Thevenot,et al.  Commonality Indices for Assessing Product Families , 2006 .

[12]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[13]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families , 2000 .

[14]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Platform Design for Customizable Products as a Problem of Access in a Geometric Space , 2003 .

[15]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: measures and design methods , 2004 .