A framework for practical work in science and scientific literacy through argumentation

This paper draws on earlier work on ideas that underpin the collection and use of evidence in science in schools. It establishes that different types of practical work share the same procedural underpinnings. It then takes the work of Toulmin on argumentation to suggest that the idea of the ‘public claim’ can be used to forge a link between scientific experimentation in schools and emerging ideas of scientific literacy. It concludes with a discussion of possible implications.

[1]  J. Noel.  Science education from 14 to 19: an awarding body perspective , 2003 .

[2]  R. Tytler,et al.  Public participation in an environmental dispute: Implications for science education , 2001 .

[3]  R. Tytler.  Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education , 2001 .

[4]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[5]  Richard Gott,et al.  Understanding and Using Scientific Evidence , 2003 .

[6]  Susan M. Drake,et al.  Discourse and the new didactics of scientific literacy , 2006 .

[7]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[8]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .

[9]  Brian E. Woolnough,et al.  Practical Work in School Science: The Dominance of Assessment. , 2002 .

[10]  P H Harasym,et al.  Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success , 2003, Medical education.

[11]  Michal Zion,et al.  Dynamic, open inquiry in biology learning , 2004 .

[12]  Mike Watts,et al.  Science in the national curriculum , 1991 .

[13]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[14]  Ros Roberts,et al.  Assessment of biology investigations , 2003 .

[15]  Peter Achinstein,et al.  Concepts of Evidence , 1978 .

[16]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom , 2006 .

[17]  C. Price.  Nullius in verba , 1974, Nature.

[18]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Pupils' and parents' views of the school science curriculum , 2000 .

[19]  Richard Gott,et al.  Problems with the Assessment of Performance in Practical Science: Which way now? , 2002 .

[20]  Laura Colucci-Gray,et al.  From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy : An ecological framework for education , 2006 .

[21]  A. Douglas,et al.  Valuable Lessons: Engaging with the Social Context of Science in schools , 2001 .