Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Variable Rate Nitrogen and Lime Application for Claypan Soil Fields

Variable Rate Technology (VRT) has the potential to increase crop yields and improve water quality relative to Uniform Rate Technology (URT). The effects on profitability and water quality of adopting VRT for nitrogen (N) and lime were evaluated for corn production on four claypan soil fields in north central Missouri under average to better than average weather conditions. Variable N and lime rates were based on measured topsoil depth and soil pH, respectively. VRT rates were compared to two different uniform N applications (URT-Nl based on the topsoil depth within these claypan soil fields, and URT-N2 based on a typical N rate for corn production in this area). Expected corn yield was predicted based on topsoil depth, soil pH, N rate, and lime rate. Water quality benefits of VRT relative to URT were evaluated based on potential leachable N. Sensitivity analyses were performed using simulated topsoil data for topsoil depth and soil pH. Results showed that VRT was more profitable than URT in the four sample fields under URT-N1, and in two of the four fields under URT-N2. Greater variation in topsoil depth and soil pH resulted in higher profitability and greater water quality benefits with VRT. Results support adoption of VRT for N and lime application for other claypan soil fields with characteristics similar to those in the fields used in this study.

[1]  James Lowenberg-DeBoer,et al.  Economics of Site‐Specific Management in Agronomic Crops , 1997 .

[2]  Newell R. Kitchen,et al.  Agrichemical movement in the root-zone of claypan soils: ridge- and mulch-tillage systems compared , 1998 .

[3]  J. Sawyer.  Concepts of Variable Rate Technology with Considerations for Fertilizer Application , 1994 .

[4]  Gary D. Schnitkey,et al.  An Economic Evaluation of Precision Fertilizer Applications on Corn-Soybean Fields , 1996 .

[5]  L. N. Kiniry,et al.  A soil productivity index based upon predicted water depletion and root growth , 1983 .

[6]  James Lowenberg-DeBoer,et al.  Evaluating the profitability of site-specific farming , 1998 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods , 1994 .

[8]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Mapping of sand deposition from 1993 midwest floods with electromagnetic induction measurements , 1996 .

[9]  Glenn Fox,et al.  Economic Feasibility of Variable‐Rate Technology for Nitrogen on Corn , 1999 .

[10]  Tony Prato,et al.  Economic and Water Quality Effects of Variable and Uniform Application of Nitrogen , 1998 .

[11]  Bruce A. Babcock,et al.  Moving from Uniform to Variable Fertilizer Rates on Iowa Corn: Effects on Rates and Returns , 1998 .

[12]  Wen-Yuan Huang,et al.  ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FEASIBILITY OF VARIABLE RATE NITROGEN FERTILIZER APPLICATION WITH CARRY-OVER EFFECTS , 1998 .

[13]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Soil Electrical Conductivity as a Crop Productivity Measure for Claypan Soils , 1999 .

[14]  C. J. Gantzer,et al.  Predicting Corn Yields on a Claypan Soil Using a Soil Productivity Index , 1987 .

[15]  N. Kitchen,et al.  Nutrient Mapping Implications of Short‐Range Variability , 1996 .

[16]  William L. Pan,et al.  Assessment of Spatially Variable Nitrogen Fertilizer Management in Winter Wheat , 1994 .

[17]  Roland K. Roberts,et al.  ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF VARIABLE RATE APPLICATION OF NITROGEN TO CORN FIELDS: ROLE OF VARIABILITY AND WEATHER , 1999 .