Placing Large Group Relations into Pedestrian Dynamics: Psychological Crowds in Counterflow

Understanding influences on pedestrian movement is important to accurately simulate crowd behaviour, yet little research has explored the psychological factors that influence interactions between large groups in counterflow scenarios. Research from social psychology has demonstrated that social identities can influence the micro-level pedestrian movement of a psychological crowd, yet this has not been extended to explore behaviour when two large psychological groups are co-present. This study investigates how the presence of large groups with different social identities can affect pedestrian behaviour when walking in counterflow. Participants (N = 54) were divided into two groups and primed to have identities as either ‘team A’ or ‘team B’. The trajectories of all participants were tracked to compare the movement of team A when walking alone to when walking in counterflow with team B, based on their i) speed of movement and distance walked, and ii) proximity between participants. In comparison to walking alone, the presence of another group influenced team A to collectively self-organise to reduce their speed and distance walked in order to walk closely together with ingroup members. We discuss the importance of incorporating social identities into pedestrian group dynamics for empirically validated simulations of counterflow scenarios.

[1]  J. Drury,et al.  Managing to avert disaster: Explaining collective resilience at an outdoor music event , 2015 .

[2]  Jan Richter,et al.  Simulation of wildfire evacuation with dynamic factors and model composition , 2016, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[3]  D. A Purser,et al.  Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations , 2001 .

[4]  S. Reicher,et al.  Cold comfort at the Magh Mela: social identity processes and physical hardship. , 2014, The British journal of social psychology.

[5]  Kardi Teknomo,et al.  Application of microscopic pedestrian simulation model , 2006 .

[6]  梁锋 群体极化(Group polarization) , 2013 .

[7]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Self-Organizing Pedestrian Movement , 2001 .

[9]  Nikolai W F Bode,et al.  Human responses to multiple sources of directional information in virtual crowd evacuations , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  Simon Garnier,et al.  Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Takamasa Iryo,et al.  Microscopic pedestrian simulation model combined with a tactical model for route choice behaviour , 2010 .

[12]  Wolfram Klein,et al.  On modelling the influence of group formations in a crowd , 2011 .

[13]  Hui Lin,et al.  An individual cognitive evacuation behaviour model for agent-based simulation: a case study of a large outdoor event , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Social influence during the initial phase of a fire evacuation—Analysis of evacuation experiments in a cinema theatre , 2009 .

[15]  Nikolai W. F. Bode,et al.  Increased costs reduce reciprocal helping behaviour of humans in a virtual evacuation experiment , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[17]  M. Moussaïd,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during collective emergencies in the help-or-escape social dilemma , 2016, Scientific reports.

[18]  Takashi Nagatani,et al.  Pattern formation and jamming transition in pedestrian counter flow , 2002 .

[19]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Aggressive, Tense or Shy? Identifying Personality Traits from Crowd Videos , 2017, IJCAI.

[20]  Hai-Jun Huang,et al.  A microscopic pedestrian-simulation model and its application to intersecting flows , 2010 .

[21]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[22]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  How the Ocean Personality Model Affects the Perception of Crowds , 2011, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[23]  Patrick Burrows Measuring the customer’s journey through London City Airport , 2015 .

[24]  Victor J. Blue,et al.  Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways , 2001 .

[25]  Y. Ge,et al.  The effect of cognitive errors, mindfulness and personality traits on pedestrian behavior in a Chinese sample , 2016 .

[26]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Counterflow model for agent-based simulation of crowd dynamics , 2012 .

[27]  Damian Schofield,et al.  Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: A new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Alexia Zoumpoulaki,et al.  A Multi-agent Simulation Framework for Emergency Evacuations Incorporating Personality and Emotions , 2010, SETN.

[29]  Patrick J Curran,et al.  Twelve Frequently Asked Questions About Growth Curve Modeling , 2010, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[30]  S. Reicher,et al.  The experience of collective participation: shared identity, relatedness and emotionality , 2011 .

[31]  Hideki Nakamura,et al.  A Modified Social Force Model for Pedestrian Behavior Simulation at Signalized Crosswalks , 2014 .

[32]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[33]  S. Reicher Mass action and mundane reality: an argument for putting crowd analysis at the centre of the social sciences , 2011 .

[34]  D. Helbing,et al.  Self-organizing pedestrian movement; Environment and Planning B , 2001 .

[35]  John Drury,et al.  Social identification moderates the effect of crowd density on safety at the Hajj , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[37]  Christopher Cocking,et al.  The Nature of Collective Resilience: Survivor Reactions to the 2005 London Bombings , 2009, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[38]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[39]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics , 2010, PloS one.

[40]  Gerta Köster,et al.  On Modeling Groups in Crowds: Empirical Evidence and Simulation Results Including Large Groups , 2014 .

[41]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Lorenza Manenti,et al.  An Agent-Based Pedestrian and Group Dynamics Model Applied to Experimental and Real-World Scenarios , 2015, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[43]  Syahriah Bachok,et al.  Simulating the Pedestrian Movement in the Public Transport Infrastructure , 2016 .

[44]  Francisco J. Serón,et al.  AI and virtual crowds: Populating the Colosseum , 2007 .

[45]  Wan Ki Chow ‘Waiting time’ for evacuation in crowded areas , 2007 .

[46]  J. Drury,et al.  Come together: two studies concerning the impact of group relations on personal space. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.