Mechanical characterization of human brain tumors from patients and comparison to potential surgical phantoms

While mechanical properties of the brain have been investigated thoroughly, the mechanical properties of human brain tumors rarely have been directly quantified due to the complexities of acquiring human tissue. Quantifying the mechanical properties of brain tumors is a necessary prerequisite, though, to identify appropriate materials for surgical tool testing and to define target parameters for cell biology and tissue engineering applications. Since characterization methods vary widely for soft biological and synthetic materials, here, we have developed a characterization method compatible with abnormally shaped human brain tumors, mouse tumors, animal tissue and common hydrogels, which enables direct comparison among samples. Samples were tested using a custom-built millimeter-scale indenter, and resulting force-displacement data is analyzed to quantify the steady-state modulus of each sample. We have directly quantified the quasi-static mechanical properties of human brain tumors with effective moduli ranging from 0.17–16.06 kPa for various pathologies. Of the readily available and inexpensive animal tissues tested, chicken liver (steady-state modulus 0.44 ± 0.13 kPa) has similar mechanical properties to normal human brain tissue while chicken crassus gizzard muscle (steady-state modulus 3.00 ± 0.65 kPa) has similar mechanical properties to human brain tumors. Other materials frequently used to mimic brain tissue in mechanical tests, like ballistic gel and chicken breast, were found to be significantly stiffer than both normal and diseased brain tissue. We have directly compared quasi-static properties of brain tissue, brain tumors, and common mechanical surrogates, though additional tests would be required to determine more complex constitutive models.

[1]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Microelastic mapping of the rat dentate gyrus , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[2]  M. Gilchrist,et al.  Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in tension at dynamic strain rates. , 2020, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[3]  D. Ying,et al.  Multilayer scaffold of electrospun PLA-PCL-collagen nanofibers as a dural substitute. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[4]  C. Pilarsky,et al.  Cancer Gene Profiling , 2016, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[5]  P. Janmey,et al.  A simple indentation device for measuring micrometer-scale tissue stiffness , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[6]  Barclay Morrison,et al.  A detailed viscoelastic characterization of the P17 and adult rat brain. , 2011, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  K Miller,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  K. Miller,et al.  Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Jiwoon Kwon,et al.  Compressive strain rate sensitivity of ballistic gelatin. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  C. Vias,et al.  How Tissue Mechanical Properties Affect Enteric Neural Crest Cell Migration , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  C. Pepine,et al.  Hypertension-linked mechanical changes of rat gut. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[12]  Lisa A. Pruitt,et al.  Mechanics of biomaterials: Fundamental principles for implant design , 2011 .

[13]  E. Kuhl,et al.  Constitutive Modeling of Brain Tissue: Current Perspectives , 2016 .

[14]  C Demene,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of Brain Tumor Elasticity Using Intraoperative Shear Wave Elastography , 2015, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.

[15]  Jennifer L West,et al.  Modeling the tumor extracellular matrix: Tissue engineering tools repurposed towards new frontiers in cancer biology. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Yilin Cao,et al.  Recent progress in stem cell differentiation directed by material and mechanical cues , 2016, Biomedical materials.

[17]  A K Ommaya,et al.  Mechanical properties of tissues of the nervous system. , 1968, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[19]  E. Botvinick,et al.  Combination scaffolds of salmon fibrin, hyaluronic acid, and laminin for human neural stem cell and vascular tissue engineering , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[20]  Barclay Morrison,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the P17 and adult rat brain from indentation in the coronal plane. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Dong Li,et al.  A Silk Fibroin/Collagen Nerve Scaffold Seeded with a Co-Culture of Schwann Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Sciatic Nerve Regeneration , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  M. Knight,et al.  Experimental validation of a flat punch indentation methodology calibrated against unconfined compression tests for determination of soft tissue biomechanics. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[23]  C. Pepine,et al.  Stem cell therapy restores viscoelastic properties of myocardium in rat model of hypertension. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[24]  Steven F. Son,et al.  Experimental modeling of explosive blast-related traumatic brain injuries , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  Karol Miller,et al.  Brain mechanics For neurosurgery: modeling issues , 2002, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[26]  F. Pervin,et al.  Mechanically Similar Gel Simulants for Brain Tissues , 2011 .

[27]  Eric C. Soller,et al.  Common features of optimal collagen scaffolds that disrupt wound contraction and enhance regeneration both in peripheral nerves and in skin. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[28]  T. Sebeok Miscellaneous Papers , 1947, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[29]  S. J. Lee,et al.  Optically based-indentation technique for acute rat brain tissue slices and thin biomaterials. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[30]  T. Osswald Understanding Polymer Processing: Processes and Governing Equations , 2010 .

[31]  Jim Vaught,et al.  Biobanking Comes of Age: The Transition to Biospecimen Science. , 2016, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[32]  V. Weaver,et al.  Tissue mechanics promote IDH1-dependent HIF1α–tenascin C feedback to regulate glioblastoma aggression , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  M. Gilchrist,et al.  Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in compression at dynamic strain rates. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[34]  D. G. T. Strange,et al.  Separating poroviscoelastic deformation mechanisms in hydrogels , 2013 .

[35]  A. Constantinesco,et al.  Fifty years of brain tissue mechanical testing: from in vitro to in vivo investigations. , 2010, Biorheology.

[36]  Megan L. McCain,et al.  Prolonged Culture of Aligned Skeletal Myotubes on Micromolded Gelatin Hydrogels , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Karlyne M. Reilly,et al.  Nf1;Trp53 mutant mice develop glioblastoma with evidence of strain-specific effects , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[38]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: A review , 2010, Clinical anatomy.

[39]  R. Cook,et al.  Mechanical measurements of heterogeneity and length scale effects in PEG-based hydrogels. , 2015, Soft matter.

[40]  D. Bigner,et al.  Novel role of hematopoietic stem cells in immunologic rejection of malignant gliomas , 2015, Oncoimmunology.

[41]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  J. van Dommelen,et al.  The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modelling. , 2006, Biorheology.

[43]  M. Koehl,et al.  The dorsal involuting marginal zone stiffens anisotropically during its convergent extension in the gastrula of Xenopus laevis. , 1995, Development.

[44]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.

[45]  Jiwoon Kwon,et al.  High-strain-rate brain injury model using submerged acute rat brain tissue slices. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[46]  Fan Yang,et al.  Bioengineered 3D brain tumor model to elucidate the effects of matrix stiffness on glioblastoma cell behavior using PEG-based hydrogels. , 2014, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[47]  Christine E. Schmidt,et al.  Advances in natural biomaterials for nerve tissue repair , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  B Pierrat,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of murine brain tissue using micro-indentation. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[49]  I. Schneider,et al.  Cellular contractility and extracellular matrix stiffness regulate matrix metalloproteinase activity in pancreatic cancer cells , 2014, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[50]  R. Composto,et al.  Nano-rheology of hydrogels using direct drive force modulation atomic force microscopy. , 2015, Soft matter.

[51]  Walter C Bell,et al.  Issues in collecting, processing and storing human tissues and associated information to support biomedical research. , 2010, Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers.

[52]  van der Tpj Tom Sande,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: interregional variation. , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[53]  K. Shull Contact mechanics and the adhesion of soft solids , 2002 .

[54]  E. Kuhl,et al.  Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation. , 2015, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[55]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.