A computational fluid dynamic study of stent graft remodeling after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVES Significant stent graft remodeling commonly occurs after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissections because of continuing expansion of the true lumen. A suboptimal proximal landing zone, minimal oversizing, and lack of a healthy distal attachment site are unique factors affecting long-term stent graft stability. We used computational fluid dynamic techniques to analyze the biomechanical factors associated with stent graft remodeling in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A series of computational fluid dynamic models were constructed to investigate the biomechanical factors affecting the drag force on a thoracic stent graft. The resultant drag force as a net change of fluid momentum was calculated on the basis of varying three-dimensional geometry and deployment positions. A series of 12 patients with type B aortic dissections treated by thoracic stent graft and followed up for more than 12 months were then studied. Computed tomography transaxial images of each patient shortly after stent graft deployment and on subsequent follow-up were used to generate three-dimensional geometric models that were then fitted with a surface mesh. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were then performed on each stent graft model according to its geometric parameters to determine the actual change in drag force experienced by the stent graft as it remodels over time. RESULTS The drag force on the stent graft model increases linearly with its internal diameter and becomes highest when the deployment position is closer to the proximal arch. Aortic curvature is not a significant factor. Serial computed tomography scans of patients showed an increase in mean inlet area from 1030 mm(2) to 1140 mm(2), and mean outlet area from 586 mm(2) to 884 mm(2) (increase of 11% and 58%, respectively; P = .05, .01). These increases are associated with a change in resultant drag force on the stent graft from 21.0 N to 24.8 N (mean increase, 19.5%; range, 0%-63.2%; P = .002). There is a positive relationship between increase in drag force and increase in stent-graft area. CONCLUSION The drag force on thoracic stent grafts is high. A significant change in stent-graft diameter occurs after endovascular repair for type B dissections, which is associated with an increase in hemodynamic drag force. These stent grafts may be subjected to a higher risk of distal migration, and continuing surveillance is mandatory.

[1]  H. Dwyer,et al.  A simulated dye method for flow visualization with a computational model for blood flow. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  D. Saloner,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics within Bifurcated Abdominal Aortic Stent-Grafts , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[3]  Michael D Dake,et al.  International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  W. Nichols,et al.  McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles , 1998 .

[5]  M. Lindh,et al.  Endovascular AAA exclusion: will stents with hooks and barbs prevent stent-graft migration? , 1998, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[6]  P. Harris,et al.  Factors and Forces Influencing Stent-Graft Migration after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair , 2002, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[7]  K Liffman,et al.  Analytical Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Forces in an Endoluminal Graft , 2001, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[8]  M. Walsh,et al.  A mathematical model to predict the in vivo pulsatile drag forces acting on bifurcated stent grafts used in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  T. Resch,et al.  The impact of stent design on proximal stent-graft fixation in the abdominal aorta: an experimental study. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[10]  P. Harris,et al.  Comparison of the Fixation Strength of Standard and Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[11]  Timothy J. Pedley,et al.  Mathematical modelling of arterial fluid dynamics , 2003 .

[12]  A. Barakat,et al.  Unsteady and three-dimensional simulation of blood flow in the human aortic arch. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  K L Vincken,et al.  Dynamic cine-CT angiography for the evaluation of the thoracic aorta; insight in dynamic changes with implications for thoracic endograft treatment. , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[14]  David M. Williams,et al.  Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  Y. Fung,et al.  BIOMECHANICS: CIRCULATION, 2ND EDITION , 1998 .

[16]  Joseph B. Franzini,et al.  Fluid Mechanics with Engineering Applications. 6th Ed. By R. L.DAUGHERTY and J. B. FRANZINI. McGraw-Hill. 1965. 574 pp. $9.95 or 80s. Fluid Dynamics. By J. W. DAILY and D. R. F. HARLEMAN. Addison Wesley. 1966. 454 pp. $12.50 or 94s. , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  T. Resch,et al.  An evaluation of centerline of flow measurement techniques to assess migration after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  S. Kee,et al.  Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.