Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting cognitive function via deep learning

The dynamic characteristics of functional network connectivity have been widely acknowledged and studied. Both shared and unique information has been shown to be present in the connectomes. However, very little has been known about whether and how this common pattern can predict the individual variability of the brain, i.e. "brain fingerprinting", which attempts to reliably identify a particular individual from a pool of subjects. In this paper, we propose to enhance the individual uniqueness based on an autoencoder network. More specifically, we rely on the hypothesis that the common neural activities shared across individuals may lessen individual discrimination. By reducing contributions from shared activities, inter-subject variability can be enhanced. Results show that that refined connectomes utilizing an autoencoder with sparse dictionary learning can successfully distinguish one individual from the remaining participants with reasonably high accuracy (up to 99:5% for the rest-rest pair). Furthermore, high-level cognitive behavior (e.g., fluid intelligence, executive function, and language comprehension) can also be better predicted using refined functional connectivity profiles. As expected, the high-order association cortices contributed more to both individual discrimination and behavior prediction. The proposed approach provides a promising way to enhance and leverage the individualized characteristics of brain networks.

[1]  Raag D. Airan,et al.  Factors affecting characterization and localization of interindividual differences in functional connectivity using MRI , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Yong He,et al.  Chronnectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting higher cognitive functions using dynamic brain connectivity patterns , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Estimation of Dynamic Sparse Connectivity Patterns From Resting State fMRI , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  E. C. Malthouse,et al.  Limitations of nonlinear PCA as performed with generic neural networks , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[5]  Jing Yu,et al.  Linking Inter-Individual Variability in Functional Brain Connectivity to Cognitive Ability in Elderly Individuals , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[6]  Honglak Lee,et al.  Sparse deep belief net model for visual area V2 , 2007, NIPS.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[8]  M. Kramer Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks , 1991 .

[9]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Juha Karhunen,et al.  Generalizations of principal component analysis, optimization problems, and neural networks , 1995, Neural Networks.

[11]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders , 2008, ICML '08.

[13]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[15]  Laurens van der Maaten,et al.  Learning a Parametric Embedding by Preserving Local Structure , 2009, AISTATS.

[16]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Raphael T. Gerraty,et al.  Transfer of Learning Relates to Intrinsic Connectivity between Hippocampus, Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex, and Large-Scale Networks , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Capturing Dynamic Connectivity From Resting State fMRI Using Time-Varying Graphical Lasso , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Gerry Leisman,et al.  Thinking, Walking, Talking: Integratory Motor and Cognitive Brain Function , 2016, Front. Public Health.

[23]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Time-Varying Brain Connectivity in fMRI Data: Whole-brain data-driven approaches for capturing and characterizing dynamic states , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[24]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Contractive Auto-Encoders: Explicit Invariance During Feature Extraction , 2011, ICML.

[26]  John Duncan,et al.  Fluid Intelligence Predicts Novel Rule Implementation in a Distributed Frontoparietal Control Network , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[28]  O. Andreassen,et al.  Delayed stabilization and individualization in connectome development are related to psychiatric disorders , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Marc'Aurelio Ranzato,et al.  Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning , 2011, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[30]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[31]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[34]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[35]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Stacked Denoising Autoencoders: Learning Useful Representations in a Deep Network with a Local Denoising Criterion , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[36]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  Refined measure of functional connectomes for improved identifiability and prediction , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Estimating Dynamic Functional Brain Connectivity With a Sparse Hidden Markov Model , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Individual variability in functional connectivity predicts performance of a perceptual task , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2010, ICML.