Learning scenes from multiple views: Novel views can be recognized more efficiently than learned views

In two experiments, participants were trained to recognize a playground scene from four vantage points and were subsequently asked to recognize the playground from a novel perspective between the four learned viewing perspectives, as well as from the trained perspectives. In both experiments, people recognized the novel view more efficiently than those that they had recently used in order to learn the scene. Additionally, in Experiment 2, participants who viewed a novel stimulus on their very first test trial correctly recognized it more quickly (and also tended to recognize it more accurately) than did participants whose first test trial was a familiar view of the scene. These findings call into question the idea that scenes are recognized by comparing them with single previous experiences, and support a growing body of literature on the existence of psychological mechanisms that combine spatial information from multiple views of a scene.

[1]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  S. Ullman Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views , 1998, Cognition.

[3]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[4]  S Edelman,et al.  Effects of parametric manipulation of inter-stimulus similarity on 3D object categorization. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[5]  T. Palmeri,et al.  Learning About Categories in the Absence of Training: Profound Amnesia and the Relationship Between Perceptual Categorization and Recognition Memory , 1999 .

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a 2D view interpolation theory of object recognition , 1991 .

[9]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  T. McNamara,et al.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory , 2002 .

[11]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[14]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[15]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[16]  David Waller,et al.  View combination in scene recognition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation and recognition in vision , 1999 .

[18]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  S. Zaki,et al.  A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: Dramatic effects of category learning during test , 2007, Memory & cognition.