Dynamic Analysis of Semi-Active Control Techniques for Vehicle Applications

Dynamic Analysis of Semi-Active Control Techniques for Vehicle Applications by Fernando D. Goncalves Mehdi Ahmadian, Chairman Mechanical Engineering This experimental study evaluates the dynamic response of five semi-active control policies as tested on a single suspension quarter-car system. Incorporating a magnetorheological damper, the full-scale 2DOF quarter-car system was used to evaluate skyhook, groundhook, and hybrid control. Two alternative skyhook policies were also considered, namely displacement skyhook and relative displacement skyhook. As well as exploring the relative benefits of each of these controllers, the performance of each semiactive controller was compared to the performance of conventional passive damping. Each control policy is evaluated for its control performance under three different base excitations: chirp, step, and pure tone. Corresponding to the chirp input, transmissibilities and auto spectrums are considered for each control policy. Specifically, transmissibilities between the sprung mass displacement and the unsprung mass displacement are generated relative to the input displacement. Further, the ratio between the relative displacement across the damper and the input displacement is evaluated for each control technique. The chirp input also reveals the results of the auto spectrums of the sprung and unsprung mass accelerations. Both the step input and the pure tone input were used to generate time domain values of RMS and peak-to-peak displacements and accelerations. This study shows that semi-active control offers benefits beyond those of conventional passive damping. Further, traditional skyhook control is shown to outperform the less conventional alternative skyhook policies. ii

[1]  Keum-Shik Hong,et al.  Semi-active control of the Macpherson suspension system: hardware-in-the-loop simulations , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37162).

[2]  Davor Hrovat,et al.  Optimum Vehicle Suspensions Minimizing RMS Rattlespace, Sprung-Mass Acceleration and Jerk , 1981 .

[3]  Carla Seatzu,et al.  Semiactive Suspension Design with an Optimal Gain Switching Target , 1999 .

[4]  Christopher A. Pare.  Experimental Evaluation of Semiactive Magneto-Rheological Suspensions for Passenger Vehicles , 1998 .

[5]  C. Rogers,et al.  Magnetorheological Fluids: Materials, Characterization, and Devices , 1996 .

[6]  Rgm Rudolf Huisman,et al.  Preview estimation and control for (semi-) active suspensions , 1992 .

[7]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Active and semi-active vibration isolation , 1995 .

[8]  Dieter Hennecke,et al.  EDC III-The New Variable Damper System for BMW's Top Models- A Further Development of our Adaptive, Frequency-Dependent Damper Control , 1990 .

[9]  Xubin Song.  Design of Adaptive Vibration Control Systems with Applicaion to Magneto-Rheological Dampers , 1999 .

[10]  Alessandro Giua,et al.  Approximation of an optimal gain switching active law with a semiactive suspension , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.98CH36104).

[11]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Vibration control of an MR seat damper for commercial vehicles , 2000, Smart Structures.

[12]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Control and response characteristics of a magnetorheological fluid damper for passenger vehicles , 2000, Smart Structures.

[13]  Andrew G. Alleyne,et al.  Application of Nonlinear Control Theory to Electronically Controlled Suspensions , 1993 .

[14]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Active suspension control of ground vehicle based on a full-vehicle model , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[15]  James Conner Poynor.  Innovative Designs for Magneto-Rheological Dampers , 2001 .

[16]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Active suspension control using a novel strut and active filtered feedback: design and implementation , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.99CH36328).

[17]  Roger Stanway,et al.  Vibration isolation using a magnetorheological damper in the squeeze-flow mode , 1999, Smart Structures.

[18]  Zhou Kong-kang.  Adaptive Fuzzy Control of Semi-Active Suspension , 2001 .

[19]  Kyongsu Yi,et al.  A new adaptive sky-hook control of vehicle semi-active suspensions , 1999 .

[20]  David E. Simon,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Semiactive Magnetorheological Primary Suspensions for Heavy Truck Applications , 1998 .

[21]  Aleksander Hac,et al.  Optimal Semi-Active Suspension with Preview based on a Quarter Car Model , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.