'Capture ready' regulation of fossil fuel power plants - Betting the UK's carbon emissions on promises of future technology

Climate change legislation requires emissions reductions, but the market shows interest in investing in new fossil fuelled power plants. The question is whether capture ready policy can reconcile these interests. The term ‘capture ready’ has been used a few years by the UK Government when granting licences for fossil fuelled power plants, but only recently has the meaning of the term been defined. The policy has been promoted as a step towards CCS and as an insurance against carbon lock-in. This paper draws on literature on technology lock-in and on regulation of technology undergoing development. Further, versions of the capture readiness concept proposed to date are compared. Capture readiness requirements beyond the minimum criterion of space on the site for capture operations are explored. This includes integration of capture and power plant, downstream operations, overall system integration and regulation of future retrofitting. Capture readiness comes with serious uncertainties and is no guarantee that new-built fossil plants will be abatable or abated in the future. As a regulatory strategy, it has been over-promised in the UK.

[1]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  Handbook of Sustainable Development , 2009 .

[2]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[3]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[4]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[5]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[6]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[7]  Gregory C. Unruh,et al.  Globalizing carbon lock-in , 2006 .

[8]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[9]  David Collingridge,et al.  David Collingridge: The Management of Scale. Big Organizations, Big Decisions, Big Mistakes , 1992 .

[10]  Jim Watson,et al.  CCS in the UK: Squaring coal use with climate change? , 2009 .

[11]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[12]  Jeffrey L. Funk,et al.  Components, Systems and Technological Discontinuities: Lessons from the IT Sector , 2008 .

[13]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[14]  M. Winskel.  Autonomy's End , 2002 .

[15]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Capture-ready coal plants—Options, technologies and economics , 2007 .

[16]  Jennie C. Stephens,et al.  Coupling CO 2 Capture and Storage with Coal Gasification: Defining "Sequestration-Ready" IGCC , 2005 .

[17]  Richard H. Worden,et al.  Geological storage of carbon dioxide , 2007, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[18]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[19]  Eric Brown,et al.  Report no. 4 , 1873 .

[20]  J. Reavell,et al.  Institution of Chemical Engineers , 1930 .

[21]  T. P. Hughes.  Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[22]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Flexibility strategies for sustainable technology development , 2001 .

[23]  J. Gibbins,et al.  Preparing for global rollout: A ‘developed country first’ demonstration programme for rapid CCS deployment , 2008 .

[24]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .