Localization of brief sounds: effects of level and background noise.

Listeners show systematic errors in vertical-plane localization of wide-band sounds when tested with brief-duration stimuli at high intensities, but long-duration sounds at any comfortable level do not produce such errors. Improvements in high-level sound localization associated with increased stimulus duration might result from temporal integration or from adaptation that might allow reliable processing of later portions of the stimulus. Free-field localization judgments were obtained for clicks and for 3- and 100-ms noise bursts presented at sensation levels from 30 to 55 dB. For the brief (clicks and 3-ms) stimuli, listeners showed compression of elevation judgments and increased rates and unusual patterns of front/back confusion at sensation levels higher than 40-45 dB. At lower sensation levels, brief sounds were localized accurately. The localization task was repeated using 3-ms noise burst targets in a background of spatially diffuse, wide-band noise intended to pre-adapt the system prior to the target onset. For high-level targets, the addition of background noise afforded mild release from the elevation compression effect. Finally, a train of identical, high-level, 3-ms bursts was found to be localized more accurately than a single burst. These results support the adaptation hypothesis.

[1]  R. Butler,et al.  Factors that influence the localization of sound in the vertical plane. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P M Hofman,et al.  Spectro-temporal factors in two-dimensional human sound localization. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Individual differences in external-ear transfer functions reduced by scaling in frequency. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Auditory spectral discrimination and the localization of clicks in the sagittal plane. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Gilkey,et al.  Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W Noble,et al.  Available response choices affect localization of sound , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Stanley P. Lipshitz,et al.  Stereo Microphone Techniques: Are the Purists Wrong? , 1985 .

[10]  Michael D. Good,et al.  Auditory localization in noise. I. The effects of signal‐to‐noise ratio , 1994 .

[11]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions , 1990, Hearing Research.

[12]  M. C. Brown,et al.  Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat , 1986, Hearing Research.

[13]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Ewan A. Macpherson A comparison of spectral correlation and local feature‐matching models of pinna cue processing , 1997 .

[15]  M. Sachs,et al.  Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Sachs,et al.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J. C. Middlebrooks Narrow-band sound localization related to external ear acoustics. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Mark A. Stellmack,et al.  Localization of a virtual acoustic target in the presence of a distractor , 1995 .

[21]  F. Asano,et al.  Role of spectral cues in median plane localization. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  W. Buño,et al.  Auditory nerve fiber activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation , 1978, Experimental Neurology.

[24]  B. May,et al.  Spectral cues for sound localization in cats: a model for discharge rate representations in the auditory nerve. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Simon R. Oldfield,et al.  Acuity of Sound Localisation: A Topography of Auditory Space. I. Normal Hearing Conditions , 1984, Perception.

[26]  M. Cynader,et al.  A computational theory of spectral cue localization , 1993 .

[27]  John J. Guinan Effects of medial olivocochlear efferents on responses of auditory nerve fibers , 1994 .

[28]  Simon Carlile,et al.  The nature and distribution of errors in sound localization by human listeners , 1997, Hearing Research.

[29]  Marcel J. E. Golay,et al.  Complementary series , 1961, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[30]  J. Guinan,et al.  Medial efferent effects on auditory-nerve responses to tail-frequency tones. I. Rate reduction. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D. M. Green,et al.  Characterization of external ear impulse responses using Golay codes. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.