The Red Queen in organizational creation and development

We synthesize organization learning theory and organizational ecology to predict systematic patterns in the founding and growth of organizations over time. Our central argument is that competition triggers organizational learning, which in turn intensifies competition that again triggers an adaptive response. We model this self-exciting dynamic--sometimes referred to as the 'Red Queen' in general evolutionary theory--to explain organizational founding and growth rates among the thousands of retail banks that have operated in Illinois at any time from 1900--1993. We find strong evidence that Red Queen evolution led some organizations to grow quickly and to place strong competitive pressure on rivals. Red Queen evolution also helped establish barriers to entry. However, this same evolutionary process appears to make organizations more susceptible to 'competency traps', ultimately slowing their growth rates and inviting new market entry. Organizations confronted by a widely varying distribution of competitors grow more slowly and are more likely to face new entrants. Overall, the results suggest that processes of organizational creation and growth emerge from ecologies of learning organizations. More generally, we discuss the use of ecological theory and models to study the empirical consequences of organizational learning. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms , 2003 .

[2]  Eberhard Bruckner Überlebenschancen neu gegründeter Firmen: Ein evolutionstheoretischer Zugang , 2003 .

[3]  G. Carroll,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change Revisited I: Architecture, Culture and Cascading Change , 2002 .

[4]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[5]  O. Sorenson The Effect of Population Level Learning on Market Entry : The American Automobile Industry , 1998 .

[6]  Gwendolyn Halford,et al.  County and City Data Book , 1999 .

[7]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Dynamics of Competitive Intensity , 1997 .

[8]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Patterns of Competition: The Diffusion of a Market Position in Radio Broadcasting , 1996 .

[10]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  An Evolutionary Model of Organizational Performance , 1994 .

[11]  G. Carroll,et al.  On the Historical Efficiency of Competition Between Organizational Populations , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  M. Hannan,et al.  A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  James G. March,et al.  A primer on decision making : how decisions happen , 1994 .

[14]  Heather A. Haveman Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[15]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Competition, Institutional Linkages, and Organizational Growth , 1993 .

[16]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Anne S. Miner Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition , 1993 .

[18]  G. Guo Event-history analysis for left-truncated data. , 1993, Sociological methodology.

[19]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  On the Relationship Between Firm Size and Export Intensity , 1992 .

[20]  G. Carroll,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition.By Michael T. Hannan and Glenn R. Carroll. Oxford University Press, 1992. 286 pp. $29.95 , 1992 .

[21]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[22]  David Barron,et al.  The Analysis of Count Data: Over-dispersion and Autocorrelation , 1992 .

[23]  James T. Hamilton,et al.  Employers Large and Small , 1990 .

[24]  M. Hannan,et al.  The ecology of organizational size distributions: A microsimulation approach , 1990 .

[25]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[26]  Jean G. Padioleau Decisions and Organizations , 1989 .

[27]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[28]  M. Lazerson,et al.  Organizational Growth of Small Firms - An Outcome of Markets and Hierarchies , 1988 .

[29]  G. Carroll,et al.  Telephone and Automobile Diffusion in the United States, 1902-1937 , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Competition and Mutualism among Early Telephone Companies , 1987 .

[31]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[32]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector , 1986 .

[33]  N. Stenseth,et al.  COEVOLUTION IN ECOSYSTEMS: RED QUEEN EVOLUTION OR STASIS? , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  Mark Granovetter,et al.  SMALL IS BOUNTIFUL: LABOR MARKETS AND ESTABLISHMENT SIZE* , 1984 .

[35]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[36]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizational Foundings: An Ecological Study of the Newspaper Industries of Argentina and Ireland , 1983 .

[37]  Lung-fei Lee Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity , 1983 .

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[39]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL EXPANSION IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF EDUCATION , 1981 .

[40]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[41]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[42]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Models of Coevolution , 1979, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[43]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[44]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[45]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  H. A. Simon,et al.  Skew Distributions and the Size of Business Firms , 1977 .

[47]  L. Engwall Skew distributions and the sizes of business firms , 1976 .

[48]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[49]  J. Laurenson Leadership in administration. , 1965, The New Zealand nursing journal. Kai tiaki.

[50]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[51]  W. Hogan,et al.  A THEORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE FIRM , 1961 .

[52]  P. Blau The Dynamics Of Bureaucracy , 1955 .

[53]  M. Friedman,et al.  Essays in Positive Economics , 1954 .

[54]  Amos H. Hawley,et al.  Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure , 1950 .

[55]  R. Merton The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .