Digital Radiography

Digital radiography has been accessible in dentistry for over 25 years, yet it has not supplanted customary film-based radiography totally. This could be a result of the costs engaged with supplanting ordinary radiographic hardware with a digital imaging framework, or on the grounds that actualizing new innovation in the dental practice requires a touch of fearlessness. As utilization of digital radiography turns out to be increasingly normal, many dental specialists are thinking about whether and how they can supplant regular film-based imaging with a digital framework. In this review article we will tell the digital imaging and its recent advancements.

[1]  Anna Gerber,et al.  Oral Radiology Principles And Interpretation , 2016 .

[2]  C. David,et al.  Digital Imaging in Dentistry: An Overview , 2014 .

[3]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: A systematic review , 2010, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[4]  P. Güneri,et al.  How many times can we use a phosphor plate? A preliminary study. , 2009, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  W. Howerton,et al.  Advancements in digital imaging: what is new and on the horizon? , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  P. van der Stelt.  Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography. , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  P. van der Stelt.  Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  G. Christensen.  Why switch to digital radiography? , 2004, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  C. Angelopoulos,et al.  Storage phosphor plates: how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system? , 2004, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[10]  E. Whaites,et al.  Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions. , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  E. Parks,et al.  Digital radiography: an overview. , 2002, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[12]  M. Analoui,et al.  Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[13]  C F Hildebolt,et al.  Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography. , 2000, Dental clinics of North America.

[14]  A Mol,et al.  Image processing tools for dental applications. , 2000, Dental clinics of North America.

[15]  J R Geist,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[16]  A G Farman,et al.  In vivo accuracy and reliability of color-coded image enhancements for the assessment of periradicular lesion dimensions. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[17]  L S Brooksby,et al.  Digital radiography. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[18]  C. Streckfus,et al.  Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[19]  P. van der Stelt,et al.  Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[20]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems. , 1983, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.