Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study

[1]  Y. Sim,et al.  Anaesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in children's dentistry: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[2]  Veena Arali,et al.  Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine mandibular buccal infiltration compared to 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in children with irreversible pulpitis. , 2015, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[3]  A. O’Connell,et al.  Articaine use in children: A review , 2012, European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.

[4]  M. Pogrel.  Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a current update. , 2012, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[5]  P. Arrow.  A comparison of articaine 4% and lignocaine 2% in block and infiltration analgesia in children. , 2012, Australian dental journal.

[6]  S. Poorni,et al.  Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  K. Weiss,et al.  Evidence-based assessment of pediatric pain. , 2008, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[8]  M. Hall,et al.  The incidence of adverse reactions following 4% septocaine (articaine) in children. , 2008, Pediatric dentistry.

[9]  J. Whitworth,et al.  Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  A. Reader,et al.  The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  D. Ram,et al.  Comparison of articaine 4% and lidocaine 2% in paediatric dental patients. , 2006, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[12]  J. Whitworth,et al.  Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  E. Naveh,et al.  A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections. , 2005, Anesthesia progress.

[14]  A. Reader,et al.  A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  P. Bijur,et al.  Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[16]  A. Gowans,et al.  The use of patient-controlled transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation (TENS) to decrease the discomfort of regional anaesthesia in dentistry: a randomised controlled clinical trial. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  P Milgrom,et al.  Four dimensions of fear of dental injections. , 1997, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[18]  P. Milgrom,et al.  Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. , 1984, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[19]  L. Friedman,et al.  Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new topical anesthetic. , 1974, Anesthesia Progress.

[20]  G. Klingberg,et al.  Best clinical practice guidance for local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: an EAPD policy document , 2017, European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.

[21]  H. V. van Waes,et al.  Comparison of two epinephrine concentrations in an articaine solution for local anesthesia in children. , 2015, Swiss dental journal.

[22]  A. Sharaf.  Evaluation of mandibular infiltration versus block anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. , 1997, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[23]  D. Ramsay,et al.  Topical anesthesia: differentiating the pharmacological and psychological contributions to efficacy. , 1994, Anesthesia progress.