Electronic waste—a modern form of risk? On the consequences of the delay between the increasing generation of electronic waste and regulations to manage this increase

ABSTRACT This article addresses the relation between the current proliferation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) goods and services and the development of different kinds of risk assessments and policy documents. The ambition is to shed light on a, hithertho, less-discussed aspect of the development of risk assessments and policy documents, namely the time span between the development of new technologies and the development of regulatory frameworks. The concept of risk and danger can be seen as a potential means through which we can start to think about the consequences of the delay between the increased generation of electronic waste (e-waste) and the regulations to manage this increase. By using e-waste as a case study, this article provides the basis for a more general understanding of the relation between the development of new technologies and the development of regulatory frameworks. While it might be difficult to pin down the effects that this delay had/has for the subsequent development of ICTs, this article highlights the importance of taking into account not only how and by whom risk assessments and policy documents are developed, but also when they are developed in relation to the technologies that they serve to regulate.

[1]  E. Frow Rhetorics and practices of democratization in synthetic biology , 2015 .

[2]  Allison Macfarlane,et al.  Underlying Yucca Mountain , 2003 .

[3]  ‘Are You Fed up with Your PC? Get A Mac.’ Swedish Popular Media Representations of Digital Technologies and the Stockpiling Behavior of Consumers , 2015 .

[4]  Naoko Tojo,et al.  The Producer Responsibility Principle of the WEEE Directive. Final Report , 2007 .

[5]  I. Lorenzoni,et al.  The (Mis)understanding of Scientific Uncertainty? How Experts View Policy-Makers, the Media and Publics , 2015 .

[6]  M. Tallacchini Governing by Values. EU Ethics: Soft Tool, Hard Effects , 2009 .

[7]  Franc Mali Bringing converging technologies closer to civil society: the role of the precautionary principle , 2009 .

[8]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[9]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Electronic waste—an emerging risk? , 2005 .

[10]  Lorenz Erdmann,et al.  Expected Environmental Impacts of Pervasive Computing , 2004 .

[11]  U. Beck Risk Society Revisited: eory, Politics and Research Programmes , 2006 .

[12]  Philip J. Landrigan,et al.  The precautionary principle: protecting public health, the environment and the future of our children , 2004 .

[13]  S. Shackley,et al.  Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority , 1996 .

[14]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance , 2003 .

[15]  L. Levidow Making Europe unsafe for agbiotech , 2009 .

[16]  J. Murphy,et al.  Regulatory Standards for Environmental Risks , 2006 .

[17]  Anwesha Borthakur Generation and Management of Electronic Waste in the City of Pune, India , 2014 .

[18]  Ulrike Felt,et al.  Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously , 2009 .

[19]  Magdalena Mo Ching Mok,et al.  Editorial , 2016 .

[20]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Procedural Choices in Regulatory Science , 1993 .

[21]  B. Wynne Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[22]  Andreas Breiter,et al.  Assessing the side-effects of ICT development: E-waste production and management: A case study about cell phone end-of-life in Manado, Indonesia , 2013 .

[23]  E. Carlson :Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States , 2008 .

[24]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Soziologie des Risikos , 1991 .

[25]  Carys Jones,et al.  Understanding e-Waste Management in Developing Countries: Strategies, Determinants, and Policy Implications in the Indian ICT Sector , 2014, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[26]  M. Korstanje The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[27]  B. Wynne Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism , 2003 .

[28]  C. Hardy,et al.  Organizing Risk: Discourse, Power, and “Riskification” , 2015 .

[29]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science , 2003 .

[30]  Patrick Wäger,et al.  Smart labels in municipal solid waste — a case for the Precautionary Principle? , 2005 .

[31]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[32]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[33]  S. Jasanoff Designs on Nature , 2005 .

[34]  A. Fischer,et al.  Public Acceptance of New Technologies in Food Products and Production , 2007 .

[35]  R. Rowe,et al.  Making waste management public (or falling back to sleep) , 2014, Social studies of science.

[36]  Olga Kuchinskaya,et al.  Twice invisible: Formal representations of radiation danger , 2013 .

[37]  C. Cranor Toward understanding aspects of the precautionary principle. , 2004, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[38]  Arie Rip,et al.  TAKING EUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY SERIOUSLY Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission , 2007 .

[39]  B. Wynne Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out? , 2002 .

[40]  R. V. Schomberg A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[41]  Sunil Kumar,et al.  E‐waste: a new challenge for waste management in India , 2004 .

[42]  Josh Lepawsky,et al.  Mapping international flows of electronic waste , 2010 .