How Long and What For? Tracking a Nationally Representative Sample to Quantify Internet Use

Testing communication theories requires a valid empirical basis, yet especially for usage time measures, retrospective self-reports have shown to be biased. This study draws on a unique data set of 923 Swiss internet users who had their internet use tracked for at least 30 days on mobile and desktop devices and took part in a survey covering internet usage as well as person-level background variables. The analysis focuses on active usage time overall and on the major services Google Search, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, and the online newspaper 20 Minuten. The results showed that overall internet usage time was lower for older and higher-educated users based on both the tracking and survey data, and the reported usage time was consistently higher than the tracked usage time. The tracking data further revealed that internet users in all social groups spent the majority of their time online on a mobile device. The number of users of the major services varied mainly between age groups. These differences were less pronounced when it came to the time users spent engaging with these services. Over the course of a day, the major services varied in their frequency of use: for example, messaging peaked before noon and in the late afternoon, whereas online news use was comparably constant at a lower level.

[1]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Exploring Motivations for Online Privacy Protection Behavior: Insights From Panel Data , 2018, Communication Research.

[2]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  Who Is Exposed to News? It Depends on How You Measure: Examining Self-Reported Versus Behavioral News Exposure Measures , 2018, Social Science Computer Review.

[3]  C. Cristancho,et al.  Echo-chambers in online news consumption: Evidence from survey and navigation data in Spain , 2019, European Journal of Communication.

[4]  Veronika Karnowski,et al.  Reporting Mobile Social Media Use: How Survey and Experience Sampling Measures Differ , 2018, Communication Methods and Measures.

[5]  Johannes Breuer,et al.  The overstated generational gap in online news use? A consolidated infrastructural perspective , 2021, New Media Soc..

[6]  Peter Neijens,et al.  How Much Time Do You Spend Online? Understanding and Improving the Accuracy of Self-Reported Measures of Internet Use , 2017 .

[7]  Ericka Menchen-Trevino,et al.  The extent and nature of ideological selective exposure online: Combining survey responses with actual web log data from the 2013 Israeli Elections , 2016, New Media Soc..

[8]  Pascal Jürgens,et al.  Two Half-Truths Make a Whole? On Bias in Self-Reports and Tracking Data , 2020, Social Science Computer Review.

[9]  Cornelius Puschmann,et al.  Explaining Online News Engagement Based on Browsing Behavior: Creatures of Habit? , 2019, Social Science Computer Review.

[10]  Michael Scharkow The Reliability and Temporal Stability of Self-reported Media Exposure: A Meta-analysis , 2019, Communication Methods and Measures.

[11]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  EU Kids Online 2020. Survey results from 19 countries , 2020 .

[12]  Michael Scharkow,et al.  The Accuracy of Self-Reported Internet Use—A Validation Study Using Client Log Data , 2016 .

[13]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  How Well Do People Report Time Spent on Facebook?: An Evaluation of Established Survey Questions with Recommendations , 2020, CHI.

[14]  S. Mo Jang,et al.  Good News! Communication Findings May be Underestimated: Comparing Effect Sizes with Self-Reported and Logged Smartphone Use Data , 2020, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Grant Blank,et al.  The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media , 2018 .

[16]  Damian Trilling,et al.  3bij3 – Developing a framework for researching recommender systems and their effects , 2020 .

[17]  Sebastian Stier,et al.  Integrating Survey Data and Digital Trace Data: Key Issues in Developing an Emerging Field , 2019, Social Science Computer Review.

[18]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook , 2019, Science Advances.