Sex bias in preclinical research and an exploration of how to change the status quo

There has been a revolution within clinical trials to include females in the research pipeline. However, there has been limited change in the preclinical arena; yet the research here lays the ground work for the subsequent clinical trials. Sex bias has been highlighted as one of the contributing factors to the poor translation and replicability issues undermining preclinical research. There have been multiple calls for action, and the funders of biomedical research are actively pushing the inclusion of sex as a biological variable. Here, we consider the current standard practice within the preclinical research setting, why there is a movement to include females and why the imbalance exists. We explore organizational change theory as a tool to shape strategies needed at an individual and institute level to change the status quo. The ultimate goal is to create a scientific environment in which our preclinical research automatically implements sex‐sensitive approaches.

[1]  C. E. McCormack,et al.  Do you know the sex of your cells? , 2014, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[2]  Katie Lidster,et al.  Two Years Later: Journals Are Not Yet Enforcing the ARRIVE Guidelines on Reporting Standards for Pre-Clinical Animal Studies , 2014, PLoS biology.

[3]  W. Rascher,et al.  Women encounter ADRs more often than do men , 2008, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[4]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Modeling Statistics Achievement among Graduate Students , 2003 .

[5]  E. Dorsey,et al.  The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. , 2015, JAMA.

[6]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Reporting : The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research , 2010 .

[7]  G. Christiaens,et al.  Leading change , 2018, Leadership Transitions in Universities.

[8]  J. E. Kranz,et al.  Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS , 2008, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[9]  Steve D. M. Brown,et al.  Prevalence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian phenotypic traits , 2017, Nature Communications.

[10]  A. Hegarty,et al.  Attitudes towards statistics of graduate entry medical students: the role of prior learning experiences , 2014, BMC medical education.

[11]  Carolyn M. Mazure.  Our evolving science: studying the influence of sex in preclinical research , 2016, Biology of Sex Differences.

[12]  I. Zucker,et al.  Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  G. Gigerenzer.  Mindless statistics , 2004 .

[14]  Marie C. South,et al.  Can you trust your animal study data? , 2014, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  P. Senge.  The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization , 2014 .

[16]  I. Zucker,et al.  Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[17]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[18]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Does a Change in Health Research Funding Policy Related to the Integration of Sex and Gender Have an Impact? , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  F. Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.

[20]  J. Mank.  Population genetics of sexual conflict in the genomic era , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  Gillian L. Currie,et al.  Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement , 2015, PLoS biology.

[22]  Louise D McCullough,et al.  NIH initiative to balance sex of animals in preclinical studies: generative questions to guide policy, implementation, and metrics , 2014, Biology of Sex Differences.

[23]  R. Lanfear,et al.  The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science , 2015, PLoS biology.

[24]  J. Hurst.  Making sense of scents: reducing aggression and uncontrolled variation in laboratory mice , 2005 .

[25]  J. Marinković,et al.  Assessing Attitudes towards Statistics among Medical Students: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Survey of Attitudes Towards Statistics (SATS) , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  A. Hald.  A history of mathematical statistics from 1750 to 1930 , 1998 .

[27]  汪芸.  第二讲 力场分析（Force Field Analysis） , 2004 .

[28]  M. Kibbe,et al.  Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research. , 2014, Surgery.

[29]  J. Côté,et al.  First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research , 2014, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[30]  C. Nathues,et al.  Authorization of Animal Experiments Is Based on Confidence Rather than Evidence of Scientific Rigor , 2016, PLoS biology.

[31]  F. Collins,et al.  NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014 .

[32]  R. Stevens,et al.  Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models , 2016, eLife.

[33]  V. Garovic,et al.  Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists , 2016, PLoS biology.

[34]  M. McCarthy.  Incorporating Sex as a Variable in Preclinical Neuropsychiatric Research. , 2015, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[35]  H. Würbel,et al.  The Researchers’ View of Scientific Rigor—Survey on the Conduct and Reporting of In Vivo Research , 2016, PloS one.

[36]  V. Regitz-Zagrosek,et al.  Sex and gender landscape in pharmacology. , 2017, Pharmacological Research.

[37]  G. Anderson.  Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response: where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. , 2005, Journal of women's health.

[38]  Robert Shaw,et al.  Use of factorial designs to optimize animal experiments and reduce animal use. , 2002, ILAR journal.

[39]  W. Russell,et al.  Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research , 2011, PloS one.

[40]  B. Mikulski,et al.  Drug Safety : Most Drugs Withdrawn in Recent Years Had Greater Health Risks for Women , 2001 .

[41]  Suk-Kyeong Lee.  Sex as an important biological variable in biomedical research , 2018, BMB reports.

[42]  N. Karp,et al.  The Experimental Design Assistant , 2017, PLoS biology.

[43]  Kerri S. Kearney,et al.  The Grief Cycle and Educational Change: The Kubler-Ross Contribution. , 2003 .

[44]  V. Miller,et al.  Reporting of sex as a variable in cardiovascular studies using cultured cells , 2011, Biology of Sex Differences.

[45]  R. Douglas Fields,et al.  NIH policy: Status quo is also costly , 2014, Nature.

[46]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals , 2009, PloS one.

[47]  Daniel P. Jones,et al.  Twenty years and still counting: including women as participants and studying sex and gender in biomedical research , 2015, BMC Women's Health.

[48]  Marc N. Potenza,et al.  Balance of the Sexes: Addressing Sex Differences in Preclinical Research , 2016, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[49]  Francis S Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies , 2014, Nature.