Dense Power-law Networks and Simplicial Complexes

There is increasing evidence that dense networks occur in on-line social networks, recommendation networks and in the brain. In addition to being dense, these networks are often also scale-free, i.e., their degree distributions follow P(k)∝k^{-γ} with γ∈(1,2]. Models of growing networks have been successfully employed to produce scale-free networks using preferential attachment, however these models can only produce sparse networks as the numbers of links and nodes being added at each time step is constant. Here we present a modeling framework which produces networks that are both dense and scale-free. The mechanism by which the networks grow in this model is based on the Pitman-Yor process. Variations on the model are able to produce undirected scale-free networks with exponent γ=2 or directed networks with power-law out-degree distribution with tunable exponent γ∈(1,2). We also extend the model to that of directed two-dimensional simplicial complexes. Simplicial complexes are generalization of networks that can encode the many body interactions between the parts of a complex system and as such are becoming increasingly popular to characterize different data sets ranging from social interacting systems to the brain. Our model produces dense directed simplicial complexes with power-law distribution of the generalized out-degrees of the nodes.

[1]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[2]  Giulio Cimini,et al.  Emergence of Scale-Free Leadership Structure in Social Recommender Systems , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Generalized network structures: The configuration model and the canonical ensemble of simplicial complexes. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[4]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[5]  S N Dorogovtsev,et al.  Scale-free networks with exponent one. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[6]  Dmitri V. Krioukov,et al.  Exponential random simplicial complexes , 2015, 1502.05032.

[7]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Network geometry with flavor: From complexity to quantum geometry. , 2015, Physical review. E.

[8]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Interdisciplinary and physics challenges of network theory , 2015, 1509.00345.

[9]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Emergent Complex Network Geometry , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[10]  I. Ispolatov,et al.  Duplication-divergence model of protein interaction network. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Bose-Einstein condensation in complex networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[12]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[13]  S. Redner,et al.  Infinite-order percolation and giant fluctuations in a protein interaction network. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Michel A. Picardo,et al.  GABAergic Hub Neurons Orchestrate Synchrony in Developing Hippocampal Networks , 2009, Science.

[15]  S. Redner,et al.  Organization of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Jean-Gabriel Young,et al.  Construction of and efficient sampling from the simplicial configuration model. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[17]  Daniel C. Cohen,et al.  Topology of random 2-complexes , 2010, 1006.4229.

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[19]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Scale-free networks with an exponent less than two. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Two’s company, three (or more) is a simplex , 2016, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  V. Sós,et al.  Convergent Sequences of Dense Graphs I: Subgraph Frequencies, Metric Properties and Testing , 2007, math/0702004.

[23]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Statistical mechanics of the "Chinese restaurant process": lack of self-averaging, anomalous finite-size effects, and condensation. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Thilo Gross,et al.  All scale-free networks are sparse. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[25]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[26]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  What is network science? , 2013, Network Science.

[27]  S. Redner,et al.  Structural Transitions in Densifying Networks. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[28]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Structure of growing networks with preferential linking. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[29]  Henry Markram,et al.  Cliques of Neurons Bound into Cavities Provide a Missing Link between Structure and Function , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[30]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[31]  J. Pitman,et al.  Notes on the occupancy problem with infinitely many boxes: general asymptotics and power laws ∗ , 2007, math/0701718.

[32]  Michael W. Reimann,et al.  Topological analysis of the connectome of digital reconstructions of neural microcircuits , 2016, 1601.01580.

[33]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Emergent Hyperbolic Network Geometry , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Owen T. Courtney,et al.  Weighted growing simplicial complexes. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[35]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks , 2001 .